India out, China in

Can Pakistan maintain that balance in a world increasingly becoming polarised?


Kamran Yousaf July 19, 2020
The writer is a senior journalist working for both print and electronic media. He tweets @Kamran_Yousaf

The ‘cold war’ between the US and China is very much here. The latest example of that rivalry is the decision by Iran to drop India from a key rail project linked to Chabahar Port. In May 2016, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and Afghan President Ashraf Ghani had signed an agreement to develop the Chabahar Port, located only 172km from Gwadar Port. At that time the trilateral agreement was seen as an effort by India to bypass Gwadar for an access to Afghanistan and beyond.

The agreement had raised the spectre of a new proxy war in the already volatile region. The relationship between Iran and Pakistan had already been marred by mistrust and growing Indian influence in its backyard further compounded the problem. The Chinese were also wary of Indian role in Chabahar Port and feared that external players would use proxies to target CPEC particularly in Balochistan. The only way to pre-empt such a scenario for China was to rope in Iran and instead of competing against it, allow Tehran to join the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

It was because of this reason that merely two months after India signed a Chabahar deal, Chinese President Xi Jingping travelled to Tehran where both sides agreed to work out a 25-year strategic partnership deal. Reports suggested that China would invest $400 billion in next 25 years in Iran. On the other hand, India despite having strong ties with Iran spanning over decades did only lip service. It promised to fund Chabahar-Zahedan rail track but could not deliver despite the fact the US exempted Indian investment of its economic sanctions.

In a recent statement the Iranian Ambassador to Pakistan without explicitly mentioning India by name stated as to why Tehran dropped New Delhi from the rail project. “When some foreign governments [are] found reluctant in their relations with Iran and need other’s permission for their even normal interactions, for sure they won’t be capable of planning and implementing such long-term cooperation contracts,” he said days after Iran decided to build a rail track from its own resources.

What does this development mean for Pakistan? With India being kicked out of the Chabahar Port project and China stepping in, Islamabad clearly has an advantage. Despite being neighbours, relations between Pakistan and Iran have never been smooth. Part of the reason is that both have had divergent interests. During the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan were in different camps. Also, Pakistan’s close strategic ties with the Arab world particularly with Saudi Arabia made ties with Iran a complicated affair. The two countries have a long list of grievances against each other. Both suspect that they allow elements to use their respective soils against the other.

But with China now investing big-time both in Iran and Pakistan, the two will have convergence on many key strategic and economic issues. Iran will now have interests in Gwadar Port as well as CPEC and hence it will never let elements targeting the Chinese investment operate from its oil. Similarly, with Indian influence receding in Iran, Pakistan would also view Tehran differently. There is definitely going to be a paradigm shift.

However, there are challenges too! Pakistan, no doubt, considers China a strategic partner but at the same time never wants to antagonise the US. Can it maintain that balance in a world increasingly becoming polarised? Not just that the Arab friends of Pakistan may not be happy either seeing close proximity between Iran and Pakistan. This situation requires statecraft and decisions keeping in view long-term strategic benefits for Pakistan. Can the current setup that is fighting for its own survival take such difficult decisions?

Published in The Express Tribune, July 20th, 2020.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (5)

Kashif Younus | 1 year ago | Reply

Apart from the paradigm shift , the main benefit of the Chinese Investments in Iran ,I believe, would be the stop of separatist movements in Baluchistan which a seen a spike in recent months and could be fathomed from the attacks on Chinese consulate and stock exchange. Iran acting as safe havens for such elements would always be counter productive for its own ecinomic ambitions sans US shackles of none wrenching sanctions

Sultan parvez | 1 year ago | Reply

I am 73 years old and saw several political & martial law Govt. I did not see anyone who could handle the situation in favour of this country and of its population. The point is r we not capable to run a country or we just after power to grab it & then make ourselves rich & richest & involve our children to rule after us. The Army comes 2 or 3 years they rule effectively but after that they start their selves to become legal govt. Due to world pressure & lost everything. Who ever won the election the ignorant & jealous opposition will never accept the result so the Govt. Spent nearly 2-3 years to calm down these opportunist. Conclude. We are capable but our leaderships are gready & corrupt. Corrupt not only money wise but their every act becomes corrupt. So their tenure of 5 years spent self "improving" instead of country or its people.

VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read