
We will have to wait and watch with interest just how the five-member larger bench constituted for the case brings to closer scrutiny the government performance. But as this is the first suo motu action taken by the sitting CJP, some thoughts about its exercise may not be out of place. Opinion is sharply divided in the legal circles about the merit of invoking suo motu power. Indeed, some public interest issues, which often fail to garner government attention, come to the limelight once the apex court takes up hearing of its own accord. This sometimes leads to resolution of those matters. But critics of this power often class it as judicial activism. These two strands of opinion are why not all chief justices take a unified approach to using this power. The sitting CJP’s predecessor, Justice Asif Seed Khosa, for instance, never exercised this power. Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry and Justice Saqib Nisar used it liberally while three other top justices exercised the power sparingly. We tend to favour finding the middle ground.
Published in The Express Tribune, April 13th, 2020.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ