Govt received $5m out of $35m pledges: Hoti

Ameer Haider Hoti has said that his government has so far received only $5m out of the $35m for the reconstruction.


Express June 17, 2010

MINGORA: The chief minister of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa has said that his government has so far received only $5 million out of the $35 million pledged for the reconstruction of the strife-torn Malakand division.

Security forces recently quelled an insurgency spearheaded by radical cleric Maulana Fazlullah and hundreds of his loyalists who wanted to enforce their own hardline version of Islamic laws in the region. Barring sporadic incidents of violence, security forces have, by and large, purged the area of extremists.

Chief Minister Ameer Haider Hoti said the Pakistan Army would supervise the process of reconstruction and rehabilitation in the region to ensure transparency. He was speaking to journalists during his daylong visit to Swat Valley.

Hoti announced a number of infrastructure development projects for the region, saying that 50 steel bridges would be constructed in Malakand division to facilitate connectivity. “The Mingora bypass project, which will provide an important link with northern parts of Swat, will be completed this year at a cost of Rs220 million,” he added.

Maulana Fazlullah’s loyalists had dynamited a number of bridges, schools and other government buildings during their bloody campaign, inflicting an irreparable loss on the local infrastructure.

The chief minister said his government was planning some mega development projects in the region. “We will build a unique monument park in Swat in the memory of those killed during the insurgency,” he said. “Classes in the Swat University will also start within four months,” he added.

Speaking on the occasion, senior ANP leader Afzal Khan Lala said that peace could not be restored in the region in true sense unless local institutions were strengthened and schools rebuilt.

Lala said that the provincial government should expedite the reconstruction process to regain the confidence of local population. Afzal Khan Lala said they had put up a bold fight and refused to give in to militants when ANP leaders in Swat were being targeted by Maulana Fazlullah’s loyalists.

Earlier Chief Minister Hoti also inaugurated the Ayub Bridge which was blown up by militants last year, disconnecting Kabal sub-division from Mingora, the commercial hub of Swat. He also attended a photo exhibition on Swat where photographs of some of the well-known photographers of the country were on display.

The chief minister praised the Pakistan Army for restoring peace in Swat and the people of Swat for putting up a bold fight against militants. He said each photograph was a story in itself. “This exhibition will also be taken to other countries to show to the world the sacrifices of the Pakistan Army and the people of Swat,” he added.

Hoti also held out an assurance that the provincial government would restore the lost glory of Swat which used to be a popular tourist attraction before the insurgency.

Published in the Express Tribune, June 17th, 2010.

COMMENTS (2)

ali hamdani | 14 years ago | Reply It is important that these grants and the aid is utilized in the interest of citizens. There must be transparency in this procedure as the allies in the war in terror is supporting Pakistan financially to reconstruct the affected regions.
Ammar Zafarullah | 14 years ago | Reply Why pledge 35 million if we cannot provide these funds? Why give the locals a false hope? The process of rehabilitation and reconstruction need to be carried out at a swift pace. However the Chief Minister advice that these activities should be carried out by the armed forces so ensure transparency is not very sound. The mandate of armed forces is to cleanse an area free from militancy by engaging them in the process development will hamper their combat abilities. Transparency is crucial but when the chief minister says that army should supervise the development initiatives does this imply that the civilian authorities are inapt and corrupt? Development needs to be community based and the locals must take ownership of these processes. It will be wise to leave development to the locals and the development organizations that have prior experience of carrying out such tasks.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ