As for morality, just because something is a part of our culture does not make it ‘moral’, or honour killing would still be legal. Unsurprisingly, some of the most vociferous opposition to the Aurat March and other women’s liberation movements comes from political groups that opposed the enhancement of criminal penalties for honour killing. It’s never a good look to be on the same side of the cause as those supporting murder. Unfortunately, our desire to marry off our daughters to wife beaters from ‘good families’ has led us to a place where people were even offended by signs with simple messages such as ‘divorced and happy’. Apparently, it is offensive for women who survive and escape from mental and physical abuse to lead happy single lives.
It is, however, true that in some cases, marchers did cross into crass territory with some of their signage, but it was more a case of fighting fire with fire. Much of the obscene behaviour that men direct at women online and in real life these days still goes unpunished because of legal lacunas or societal issues. One example is of how women end up being criticised for complaining about receiving unsolicited obscene pictures, while the senders escape unpunished. If the easily-offended tried to correct these disturbing aspects of our culture, maybe women would not need to march.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 5th, 2020.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ