Policemen from Ghaziabad and Mughalpura stations baton charged some 300 protesters from the Barelvi sect in front of the Lahore Press Club on Friday.
Main Attiqur Rehman, a property dealer who has accused a business rival of blasphemy, claimed that the police had tried to arrest him in the moving to halt a protest scheduled for after Friday prayers. The protesters rallied in front of the club to condemn the raid and police for not registering a blasphemy case following Rehman’s complaint.
Rehman said that the police entered his house to arrest him but later left after people gathered outside the house and shouted at the police. He said on June 19, Haji Nasir Hussain a resident of Canal Park, Singhpura, had organised a majlis, where one of the speakers, Zulfiqar Haider Naqvi, uttered blasphemous remarks against the Holy Prophet (pbuh).
He said the next day he filed an application with the Ghaziabad police station against Hussain and Naqvi and demanded an FIR under Section 295-C of the Pakistan Penal Code.
He said when the police refused to register the FIR, he went to the court and obtained an order from Additional District and Sessions Judge Mahrukh Aziz Tarar in this regard. He said that despite the court order, SHO Adnan Sheikh refused to register an FIR. He said he gave the police till Thursday to comply with court order otherwise he would lead a protest demonstration on Friday after the prayers.
He said a police team headed by DSP Mian Absar Ahmad had raided his house only to halt the protest.
After Friday prayers, the Idara Sirat-i-Mustaqeem, Jamaat Ahle Sunnat, Sunni Tehrik and Ulema Ahle Sunnat activists gathered at his house and marched to Lahore Press Club. Some 30 policemen from two police stations “tried to thwart the protest”, Rehman said.
Rehman warned of more protests if an FIR was not registered. “I would prefer death to seeing a blasphemer go unpunished,” he said.
DSP Ahmad denied raiding Rehman’s house. He said however, the court had not ordered registration of an FIR. It had only ordered the police to investigate the matter.
Haji Hussain said that the speakers had not made any blasphemous remarks. He said he and Rehman were businesses rivals and that was the only reason Rehman had accused him of blasphemy.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 23rd, 2011.
COMMENTS (14)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
300 protesters!!!!!! Jail them for 1 week. Let them feel the intensity of bening jailed???
When a government and the judical system are under pressure from extremism and beyond it's control, it's on it's way to losing democracy. Another mode of dictatorship on it's way- Mullahcracy.
i think they r saying respect our prophet like we do others nothing wrong with that.
The government take necessary steps for safety of the alleged accused of blasphemy . Religious fanatics incite general public for extra judicial killing of the persons blamed for blasphemy . The accused person in this case , is entitled to protection more than Malik Ishaque.
Un-Islamic and absurd blasphemy laws are the source of all evil and tools of self-destruction.
SIck..!!
Now that Malik Ishaq is back, a new front is being opened against an already besieged sect.
wow
Where are we heading too, when Bagdad was run over by Tataries the situation was same
Sectarian mullahs are at each other's throats
So many people have been killed, their houses burnt in the name of Blasphemy. It is so easy to allegate someone to Blasphemy. Anyhow, I don't understand the point of putting this article on tribune where a bunch of people holding boards to protest in favour of Blasphemy; seems like we are done with every problem and have nothing else to report on.