Clinton opened high-level US-Indian talks with a polite but firm push for New Delhi to get moving on key economic issues as both sides seek to firm up a relationship that thus far has promised more than it has delivered.
"The stakes are high. So it is critical that this dialogue lead to concrete and coordinated steps that each of our governments take to produce real results," Clinton said in her opening remarks at the meeting, the latest in a series of talks aimed at deepening political and economic ties between the United States and the world's second most populous country.
The global economic slowdown has driven US and European companies to look for sales in emerging markets like India.
Clinton's visit will cover a range of bilateral issues including counter-terrorism cooperation, an issue thrown into stark relief by last week's deadly triple bomb attack on India's financial capital Mumbai.
Relations between the two countries have warmed since the end of the Cold War, when India was seen as closer to the old Soviet Union.
She will brief Indian leaders on US plans to draw down troops in Afghanistan, which New Delhi fears may mean a hasty US exit, as well as on Pakistan, where the halting battle against militants has spurred questions about Islamabad's true intentions.
Clinton did not mention Pakistan in her opening statements, but did underscore that Washington and New Delhi have a common challenge in confronting the threat of militant violence.
"We are allies in the fight against violent extremist networks. And homeland security is a high priority and a source of increasing partnership," Clinton said, pointing to a May summit between Indian and US security officials.
"The events in Mumbai have driven home how important it is that we get results," she said.
Wish list
US officials say they are generally pleased with growing levels of security cooperation with India, which range from intelligence sharing on terror networks to joint efforts against maritime piracy.
But India has long been unhappy about what it perceives as Washington's resistance to sharing critical, real-time information on militants in Pakistan and Afghanistan that may be plotting to attack Indian targets.
Clinton highlighted hurdles that continue to hamper progress on economic ties, which US officials say should be growing faster and deeper given India's $1.6 trillion economy.
On top of the list is civilian nuclear cooperation, which despite a landmark 2008 accord has yet to overcome Indian legal and regulatory obstacles which could open the doors to US nuclear energy companies such as General Electric and Westinghouse, the US-based arm of Japan's Toshiba .
Earlier this month New Delhi hinted that it could ban nuclear reactor purchases from countries refusing to sell sensitive nuclear technology to it after suppliers decided last month to tighten such trade against countries like India.
US officials want India to "tighten up" legislation to protect equipment makers from liability in case of nuclear accident, saying it is much more stringent than comparable laws in other countries. India is planning to spend some $150 billion on nuclear power, key to meet soaring energy demand.
"I look forward to the day when the computers of a school in Gujarat are powered by a reactor designed in America," Clinton said, referring to one of India's fast-growing states. "We need to resolve remaining issues so we can reap the rewards of a robust civil nuclear energy partnership."
Clinton will also meet Indian Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee, and is expected to press him on promises to open domestic financial and insurance markets, as well as to permit "big box" retail operations which could open the country further to US sales giants such as Wal-mart .
Clinton made clear that arms sales, too, are part of the equation, saying India, seen as one of the world's biggest defence buyers in coming years, could further improve US military cooperation by buying more US weaponry.
The United States was disappointed when India rejected US bids for an $11 billion fighter aircraft contract in April, but still hopes US companies can benefit as New Delhi forges ahead with one of the world's biggest arms purchase programs.
"The United States expects to continue developing and selling the world's most competitive products," Clinton said.
"We view these sales as important on their own terms, but also as a means to facilitate the work that the Indian and American militaries can do together."
COMMENTS (8)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
@Sam:
If not Uncle Sam atleast Sam responded, lol.
@ashok sai:
dont worry im sure ms clinton will long onto ET pakistan and respond point wise to ur concerns.. NOT lol
Havnt u learnt the art of rhetoric questions?
@David Salmon:
Dear David : Let one thing be very clear that India wants and needs a friendly relation with USA and EU. Being a libral, plural and democratic society we are natural allies. Idiologicaly india has already done it's course correction some times in early nineties and globalisation and economic reform in all the field is order of the day.
As an Indian my only expectation is that the relation between us should be for mutual trust and growth and should be in the pattern of USA- Japan/ Korea/ China / Germany/ EU relation which is mostly economic and growth oriented relation and NOT in the pattern of USA - Pak/ Philipines/ Soudi Arabia/ Egypt, which is military relation to take care of regional problems.
As a developing nation, we need huge amount of foreign investment in Infrastructure, Agriculture, Energy, Acedmics, Dairy etc. The defence relation is last priority because we know in 21 st centuray no country is going to invade other and occupy the territory. We are nuclear armed country and if such eventulity comes it can be taken care off.
DejaVu anybody? Thanks to two great nations India and Pakistan that others are taking away our hard earned money in name of "strategic alliance". Both India and Pakistan can spend less on arms and lower their foreign dependancy if we join hands. Why spend on American reactor for lighting up Gujarat computer. Why not the reaactor be made, with help of brilliant asian minds. Nothing against open market, but there has to be level of fairness and we should not be just a shopping nation which buys and produces nothing. For country like ours we should have learned this lesson thanks to our history under British raj, where they will take away our resources and sell back the finished goods. Now it is going to be USA. Wake up guys, join hands and make peace. An economically strong Pakistan, Afghanistan, India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh will be a thorn to Western financial interests. Thats why they will never truly let peace progress between India and Pakistan or Pakistan and Afghanistan. Sooner we shed the difference better will be for our generations and their future. Else we will all soon go back to the pains of British Raj.
As long as American policies towards Pakistan continues to directly undermine India's security, as is the case for several decades, Mrs Clinton should forget about dominating the retail, insurance, nuclear and arms business in India, and should be prepared to remain happy with what India is willing to offer.
Ashok Sai: a) The US supports India's SC bid, but cannot "push" China to agree. b) Rana was acquitted only of knowingly aiding the Mumbai attacks, presumably because the jury had a reasonable doubt as to his knowledge. However, it convicted him of aiding the LeT's Denmark attack plan, for which he faces 30 years in prison. c) The US already openly supports India's role in Afghan talks. d) The US is already confronting Pakistan over its support of terror. How it will react to future attacks on India would depend, in part, on the strength of the evidence tying the terrorism to official Pakistan involvement.
Ms.Clinton only lip service will not help, Please clarify the following :-
a) How far will the US push India's claim to UNSC permanent member.
b) Why Rana acquitted in Chicago trial despite the fact that he had relations to terror networks.
c) What will be the role for India in Afghan talks, will the US support India openly.
d) How will the US react when further attacks on India soil points to Pakistan.
As an Indian I would like to see the strengthed relation in the field of Research & Developement, technology and know how transfer in the fields like agriculture, dairy production, education, road, Rail, air and sea port developement, energy sectors etc.
Hence, discussion should not be limited only in the area of Defence and nuclear technology and India should not give market access to US till USA agree to co-operate fully in above areas.
Defence alliance is only an offshoot of strong economic alliance, it can not be developed in isolation. India can not allow itself to become a client state of USA. We want to become partner in mutual growth.