Observers see a thin sliver of hope in a few small developments, including the absence of acrimonious exchanges in the recent meeting of the foreign secretaries of both countries in Islamabad. It was however, Indian Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao’s comments that have given rise to the anticipation of a change. The first was her remark that perhaps it was wrong on India’s part to freeze the dialogue process with Pakistan after the 2008 Mumbai attacks. Later, she observed that “the prism through which Pakistan sees the issue of terrorism has definitely been altered”.
Given the history of their relations — one heavy with deep mistrust and mutual suspicions — it would, however, be injudicious not to remain cautious. Admittedly, a lot of water has gone down the Ganges since India decided, in the wake of the Mumbai attacks, to vent its not unjustified outrage with Pakistan, ending all official contacts and adopting a minatory posture. However, even if justified at that point in time, remaining a prisoner to this policy has brought diminishing returns to India, with many of her friends constrained to suggest, albeit diplomatically, that India needed to move on.
What, then, explains this seeming shift? It could be tactical; to refurbish its image and satisfy the desire of foreign powers for such a change. But it may also be on account of an impression that the Pakistani leadership had begun reading the writing on the wall, as regard the world’s increasing concern about its half-hearted anti-terror strategy, coupled with growing domestic challenges, evident from the PNS Mehran base fiasco. New Delhi may therefore wish to probe whether a policy of ‘engagement’ may help convince Islamabad that, with domestic problems piling up and growing international opprobrium, an improvement in relations with India is worth undertaking.
Sadly, Pakistan’s relations with the US have begun to unravel at a time when the two should be enhancing their understanding and cooperation, especially with Afghanistan having entered the ‘endgame’. A helpful gesture from India at this time may find greater receptivity in Pakistan. It would also serve to debunk the frequent charge that without active involvement of the great powers, the two neighbours are unable to make even a small move. India has never liked this ‘foreign intervention’; it now has the opportunity to prove its ability to resolve its problems, with no outside help.
India, however, has to move away from its obsession with the Mumbai attacks and accept Pakistan’s assurances of corrective measures. Some Indians may believe that Pakistan’s fears and worries about her are either misplaced or exaggerated. Even if that is the case, India needs to calm these concerns by reducing its involvement in Balochistan and appreciating Pakistan’s worries about India’s increasing presence in Afghanistan. Pakistan, too, has to show greater resolve in tackling the militants, if the aim is genuine normalisation with India. Mere protestations of innocence and disclaimers of responsibility, as regards activities of non-state actors in India, will no longer suffice.
So far, India’s interest appears to be focused only on issues of primary interest to her, such as terrorism and trade, with minimal movement on issues of importance to Pakistan, namely Kashmir, Siachen, Sir Creek and water issues. The talks need to focus on the ‘doables’ in order to build a base of trust and Siachen and Sir Creek are eminently suited for a positive initiative. Both need to recognise that the establishment of goodwill and the beginning of cooperative relations would bring great benefits to them, while a continuation of hostility is likely to be harmful to both, possibly more to Pakistan though, given India’s size, military strength and growing economic progress.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 13th, 2011.
COMMENTS (50)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ
It is then, hypocritical of India to talk about peace when it does not want to resolve issues with Pakistan. It is very straight forward - Start with the very basics - Settle Kashmir issue and get peace and understanding in return as this is the Big issue!
Most of the Indians, except Punjabis who are prone to nostalgia, do not care about peace with Pakistan. Most of the Indians want the status quo to continue.
What are they going to gain if the relations improve with Pakistan? They will gain nothing.
When Indians are not going to gain anything, why should they even lift a finger to have peaceful relation with Pakistan?
@Manit Parmar: The samjhauta blast occurred in India and those involved were Indians. So the place of trail is India. It can not out side India.
Also, all those involved are in proper jails and have no freedom what-so-ever. The investigation is still under progress and the investigators do not have a water tight case against the suspects.
I think finding out the ways to establish peace is the only solution of the problems both the countries are confronting today Unfortunately, there are some hidden hands working both in Pakistan and India which dont want that both the countries live amicably. But onus lies on the people of both countries not be trapped in the propaganda.
@Mirza: Very wise words.
On your statement: " The walls of hatred are erected to keep the people apart and to hide the facts. I am as liberal and peace loving as any Pakistani can be, and want to stretch the hand of friendship to our neighbor. However, I am a bit disappointed by most comments from the Indians and they appeared rather cold. I wish India comes out as bigger man and promote the friendship and understand the constraints of political govt of Pakistan."
The fact is that has been the Pakistani establishment that has been "erecting walls of hatred" through a systematic and institutionalized brainwashing for the past six decades. Just look at your Pakistan studies text books. I respect and understand your dismay at the negative reactions from Indians as your reaction is based on genuine goodwill. Unfortunately, the reality is that unless the Pakistani establishment changes its anti-India national identity and political construct, there is little chance of any forward movement in the peace process. It has been Pakistan that has been the aggressor in all the wars against India and Bhutto's policy of "bleed India through 1000 cuts in a 1000 year war" continues to be implemented.
You will find that Indian will take two steps for every genuine step that Pakistan takes toward peaceful coexistence. Just start with dropping anti-India terror policy, eliminate terror groups, prosecute Mumbai attack perpetrators and deport Dawood Ibrahim. That will get things moving.
@Dear Mr. Mirza, I have a great respect for you because your posts are always sane and full of wisdom, which is a rarity in Pakistan. I also know that you live in the US but, your heart beats for Pakistan and you are a true patriot. However, I was a bit disappointed to read your post where you dubbed posts of fellow Indians as cold. Please, try to understand our psych. Pakistan has given us such wounds that they refuse to heal. 26/11 was such a gruesome and traumatic event that, no Indian is going to forget it anywhere soon. Therefore, you must read the comments of Indians above by keeping in mind the behavior of the Pak establishment and its twisted policies towards India during the past decades. No Indian wants even an inch of Pak territory and majority of Indians are staunchly secular in their approach, that's why there is no hatred for muslims or Pakistanis, but surely we would never tolerate if someone is hell bent upon hurting us in any manner imaginable. We will hit back with all our might.
"Even if that is the case, India needs to calm these concerns by reducing its involvement in Balochistan and appreciating Pakistan’s worries about India’s increasing presence in Afghanistan. "
Apart from the Urdu newspapers not a single Media organization has said India is involved in Balochistan. Hillary Clinton rubbished when somebody asked her a question related to this.
Author, what makes you think India is involved in the first place? India has a policy of non-interference and there hasn't been any evidence to prove otherwise.
Even if India was involved, all I can say is tit for tat.
Can we Pakistanis realize for once that there is right and wrong. While India has many things its done wrong and it has its own religious and caste issues to deal with, India has been far more honest in its international dealings than we have.
Imagine if India let people who have committed terrorist acts wander freely in India - wait we already do that in Pakistan! We even have people like Imran Khan and Zaid Hamid defending them. We let them roam around in FATA and Karachi. We let them preach hate in Islamabad.
Both India and Pakistan have BAD people but the Pakistani government and armed forces are far worse in terms of how they've backstabbed Afghanistan, India, and their own people. We don't have the credibility to negotiate with India.
Furthermore, we keep using stupid theories like "Indian involvement in Baluchistan". If you negotiate against ghosts, you won't get anywhere. Let's get real. The Balcuhistan mess is our creation as is PNS Mehran as is the OBL discovery as is the Lal Masjid Seige.
India will be a great trading partner once we get our own house in order. I doubt they will like us but we don't have to like them either. We can just be peaceful to each other and hate each other on the cricket pitch.
@Manit Parmar In india we are not discussing having a friendly ties with pakistan. Its pakistan, pakistani analysts and people are thinking about normalising relations with india (just like this op-ed). You have to earn our friendship. You showed us your ill acts in the past; now show us some good gestures. We indians need not to do anything.
Dear Pakistanis,
we meant peace, not piece.
Its amazing how negative and nasty many of the Indian posters are here, not just here but also no other Pak sites. Whereas in Pak the general population's mood towards India has changed in a positive way, the Indians seem to have become more negative. Keeping this prevailing mood in mind, i think any kind of peace move might be premature on our part. Although yes it would be good to have peace and the positive dividends, but we can't want it on our own!
taali do haatho se bajti haiN!
I thinks its better we just concentrate on getting our own house in order. When things are better at home and if attitudes in India are conducive to peace making, then talks should continue. In the mean time we can live like normal neighbours, not loving but also not hating each other.
TC
It is understandable that the Pakistani Civil govt., Army and ISI are helpless in going after the terrorists. May be till a few years back they were tacitly supporting them, but now they find it difficult to control them or bring them to justice.
But, at least acknowledge the fact that the Mumbai attacks were carried out by a group based in Pakistan. The waves of denials which came from the establishment in the days and months after 26/11 did not help. Even to date most Pakistani 'intellectuals' base 26/11 as something staged by India itself. Pakistan may have lost Tens of Thousands to domestic terrorism and this mayhem of blasts and deaths may be common daily news, but this does not mean they belittle such events in other countries.
Some other commentators are rightly astounded by how 'learned folks' link Balochistan's problems to India's involvement. Where's the proof? Has the Pakistan govt. even complained to India or the other countries about this? Why not? I would think if there was any involvement from India in that issue, Pakistan would be talking about it as a Primary Issue in the bilateral talks.
@Manit parmar... samjhota express trial is well underway.. and the criminals are even charge sheeted and languishing in jail..As i said there is difference between India and Pakistan.
you don't need extradition treaty.. you need will and good intention.. and extradition treaty is not like flying to MARS.. it can be done.. again if Pakistan has good intention. It was proposed to Pakistan but of course they had to keep their strategic assets intact... so it was rejected by Pakistanis...
and no not all of India is RSS. And yes these are the facts.
@Mirza: I applaud you for your thoughts. I can see lot of people across the border who wants friendly relationship with Pakistan. But right now it looks more like a mirage for the reasons you have mentioned in your comment. Pak army/isi used brain washed killers for so long, Mumbai attacks is the proverbial last straw. How can a country used her resources to bring death and mayhem to her neighbour and expected to so scot free? How do you expect the relationship to prosper when you protect people like Dawood, allow goons like LeT chief to do business so openly etc.?
How preposterous to even think we will forget Mumbai. There is difference between Pakistan and India sir.. wake up from your dream.
@Max:
Don't worry about these posters. Most of them are frustrated RSS nominated people who just want to push their own agenda. I wonder how Indians are asking for terrorist involved in Mumbai attacks when there is no extradition treaty between the two countries. With that logic are you going to givw them people involved in smajhota express blast?
@Anup:
I disagree with your solution. You have mentioned all the steps that Pakistan should be taking to normalize the situation and win Indian trust but what about India? Is there anything that India needs to do to normalize relationship?
“India, however, has to move away from its obsession with the Mumbai attacks
This is most absurd statement ...
Who cares about India?
@Mirza, my friend. We, Indians, have nothing to do with Pakistan except state sponsoring terrorism on indian soil. We are treating you as a different country and not really bothered about you. But Pakistan's real power provokes wars with India, nurtures strategic assets against India and same time pakistanis speaks about peace. Pakistan's words are not matching with its action. Thats why, the whole world including India have very little confidence in Pakistan. So the cold words. We can't help it.
I am here with my fellow indian friends.
@Mirza:
I have seen quite a lot of post from you that are quite sensible. This one is too. Except, I don't think you actually understand why India can't be magnanimous beyond a point. India has never attacked Pakistan on its own, it never raised militia for fighting for portion of Kashmir it considers its own, neither has it sponsored terror attacks on Pakistan.
India doesn't expect a mea-culpa from Pakistan, but it has a right to expect civil & normal national behavior from its neighbor. So, in-spite of lack of any concrete proof of Pakistan army actually taking any action to move away from policy of support to terror groups attacking India (they still roam free), India is moving forward in the path of dialog.
Won't you call that generosity at a time when whole world is isolating Pakistan?
A strange prescription indeed with Advice to India as to what it has to do, when India seems to be getting more things right than wrong, and Pakistan seems to be getting more things wrong than right.
There is hardly any evidence of Indian interference in Baluchistan, but plenty of Pakistan interference in Kashmir etc. Heck, the entire armies of terrorists are being trained and maintained in Pakistan territory for this purpose! Similarly, there is no evidence of any malicious intent in India's involvement in Afghanistan, but plenty of evidence of Pakistan's harmful involvement in Afghan history.
So, who has to do the moderating and rethinking??
@Mirza: As an Indian I take your suggestions in the right spirit. I do not think the conditions exist for positive talks. Both countries have big problems and need to do a lot to improve the conditions of their people. That is what they must focus on rather than chasing a mirage. Once they gain some success in lifting their populations out of the grip of Poverty they will have greater support from the Public and can undertake a positive dialogue. I hope Pakistan can overcome its troubles and bring Peace, Progress and Prosperity to its people.
Indians will neither forget nor forgive the people who were behind Mumbai carnage. We will use all resources at our disposal to bring those who were involved in this heinous crime to justice. Till then consider all Indo-Pak talk just that - Talk.
@khan,maybe you are right.maybe this is because we do not simply gift our lands to appease other countries(chinese kashmir anyone??).
@ Khan - The entire South Asia is stable because its India leadership in last 2 decades, be it solving issue in Srilanka (LTTE) or Nepal (Maoist, constitution formation), Bangladesh (economic growth).
All this country look indirectly to support them on high tables (IMF, G20, World Bank, UN), and India has been pragmatic and accomodating with all its neighbours.
Indians dont follow the policy to destablize the neighbour or use terrorist as policy.
Jundullah for Iran, Taliban for Afghanistan, Hordes of other terrorist organisation for India.
@Khan: Pakistan has friendly ties with any other neighbours like Iran,Afghanistan and India also. Whereas India has very good relations with Bhutan,Bangladesh,Sri Lanka ,Barma,Afghanistan and relations are improving with China also but relations cannot improve in a single day with China and it is a process and is going in right direction.
The ball is completely in Pakistan's court. As previous respondents have said - give us Dawood Ibrahim, move on the 26/11 trials and we will begin to believe you.
The Indian establishment and the people are fed up. Mumbai was just the icing on the bloody cake. You had the Mumbai train blasts before, the Mumbai serial blasts, Kargil, Siachen, the bleed India policy, Operation gibralter, and finally the 1948 so-called tribal incursion (had it not happened, Kashmir would probably have been yours).
Why? should we pursue peace with Pakistan? To what end? Lets wait for a decade more. Their economy is in a bad state, the demographic situation is worse, there is no water. They still think the Taliban is a strategic asset, so lets wait, till the strategic assets gulps up the state. Let Hizbut join hands with LeT , Al Qaeda and Jamaate Islami, and for once rule Pakistan. As to us, either way, we are in trouble and will need to sacrifice more for a strong nation.
@Max: Yes, I agree with your statement that Indian statements are negative. If you do not live in cuckoo land you will understand the angst rationally. The same Establishment that has for over 60 years carried out propaganda and sent terrorists has no supporters in the Indian public. Without public support the Indian PM is no better than a rubber stamp. Pakistan and India were very lucky to have Manmohan Singh as the PM when 26/11 Mumbai massacre took place. With any other PM the unfolding scenario would have been tragic. There is no mood in any quarter in India(excepting PM) currently to engage with Pakistan. With this reality it is better that the two Governments concentrate in making life better for their own people rather than waste time in useless and fruitless dialogue. Indians will watch Pakistani actions rather than believe words and I am sure that better opportunities for dialogue will come in future. In the current scenario neither side is in a position to deliver anything. The real break through opportunity for both countries came after 26/11 when Pakistan President and PM promised to send head ISI to help solve the case. They were visionary but also naive because they never realized who the master minds of that tragedy were. Everyone in the World now knows why their orders were defied and Shuja Pasha refused to go. That kind of opening may not come for the next ten years. We Indians would like our leaders to continue with their Economic revival that will hopefully take India to third position behind USA and China by 2030. We are least interested in planning and scheming against others and wish everybody well. We have no objection if neighbors have any death wish, all we ask is that they should keep their Assets within their territory. Regards and Best Wishes !!
Even if Pakistan wants peace, India is a war-monger. India does not have friendly ties with any of its neighbours.
It rankles me how much Pakistani establishment people, like this author, keep speaking of Indian interference in Baluchistan without a shred of evidence.
Pakistani establishment instead of admitting to their bad governance, tries to divert the blame elsewhere.
@Adil:
She was not put behind bars and she is free to express her views.
To Mr.Tariq,
"Kashmir, Siachen, Sir Creek and water issues". Stop saying these words,India is not at all interested to hear all these things. India might be interested to hear POK. I can't understand the analysis of the author. How many dams have been built by India ?? India won't build this dam to divert water which will affect its soft-image.For Kashmir ,Indian PM has iterated many times that it is Indian part.Sir creek belongs to Gujurat. Pak should dump this absurd hopes.Pak has illegally occupied pok and G-B. gave a slice of kashmir to china to defend India.What is left to discuss ? Discussion will take place when all the kasmir will come to its previous form. One more thing which makes point is that Not a single author has mentioned the thing why pak gave land of kashmir to china ?? Do those so-called wise men think that it was a good move by Pak .Pak is really a country with fool wisemen,that's why pak's condition is like this.
As long as the army and ISI are effectively in control of Pakistan, no meaningful peace can be achieved. Kashmir and hatred toward India are the lifelines for the army. Once the people of both countries come close and see that we are not different. We have lived together for centuries without as much problem as we have in the present Pakistan. Our forefathers were Indians by birth and this fact cannot be denied. All the Pakistanis who were born before August 14, 1947 are born Indian citizens for generations. In fact in the US all Pakistani Americans with a US passport show their place of birth India if they were born before August 14, 1947. Even today most Pakistani weddings are not complete without Indian songs. Today India has more Muslims than Pakistan has, and they are doing just fine. The walls of hatred are erected to keep the people apart and to hide the facts. I am as liberal and peace loving as any Pakistani can be, and want to stretch the hand of friendship to our neighbor. However, I am a bit disappointed by most comments from the Indians and they appeared rather cold. I wish India comes out as bigger man and promote the friendship and understand the constraints of political govt of Pakistan. We have not apologized to our Bengali brethren for the atrocities committed during their independence, how can our army admit their connection to Mumbai massacre? In most such cases Pakistani public was duped by the army and ISI. Let us hope and pray that one day some Pakistani govt would become “free” of constraints and behave like a younger brother. Last but not the least; this is one of the best op-ed by a Pakistani writer on this delicate subject. Thanks and regards, Mirza
How can anyone say that Pakistan is doing everything regarding when Mumbai attacks it hides the very people who have been nominated as masterminds still roam free in Pakistan to plan future attacks. Till all those people are arrested and sent to India to face the courts the relations between India and Pakistan will not improve. Pakistani politicians are impotent to control ISI and Army who are up to their necks in perpetrating trouble in India. Control them and then talk.
Both nations need to move forward and both have to adjust to the realities of the time. However, reading the comments from India folks, it sounds like that there is more hate, paranoia, and disbelief on the Indian side than probably on the Pakistani side. I have not come across any comment where commentator made a sincere effort to extend the hand. All I see is “name-calling,” nasty remarks, and openly criticizing the raison d'État of the Pakistani state. Both the remarks and the language of commentators sometimes give the impression that these have been posted by some less educated jingoist. Anyway distracters are on both sides and the karwan of peace should keep moving.
I think India will wait till Pakistan put its house in order.. Nobody knows where pakistan will head in next couple of years with JUD and LET openly advising govt. Unless there is some direction from Army about JUD and LET, peace will wait in subcontinent
@indian guy:
Yeah keep the rhetoric going...you know what,people like you are no different from Zaid Hamid who happens to become a laughing stock among a growing number of people in Pakistan too (I wonder if many people in India knows about it,or you think that every person in Pakistan is a religious bigot). Keep on chanting the mantra of 'Atoot Ang',and keep on putting realistic people like Arundhati Roy behind bars, and even continue banning The Economist and National Geographic Society from your country when they show maps of South Asia and Kashmir.
@Anup:
A very wise post. I especially agree with your observation:
"A better relationship can only come when Pakistan makes a big gesture to show it is serious about tackling the India specific terror groups. Handing over the Mumbai accused and Dawood Ibrahim would probably be enough to get a larger chunk of the Indian public supporting better ties. Barring this the status quo will continue where both countries focus on more pressing issues till the inevitable terror attack in an Indian city causes a fresh round of tensions and a new round of diplomatic and economic reprisals by India on Pakistan.”
It is spot on. The ball has always been on Pakistan's court. Sadly, it has chosen to stick with the policy of using terrorism as a foreign policy tool. It continues to nurture anti-India and anti-Afg terror groups and still protects Dawood Ibrahim and the likes of Hafeez Saeed and LeT. As long as this is the case, no serious positive developments can be expected. There can be little doubt that soon or later there will be another bigger Mumbai committed by the ISI's "strategic assets".
India has to formulate its policies accepting these realities.
A well articulated article with the usual suggestion that India should move on despite repeated attacks by terror brigades from Pakistan. Each time India is a victim, Pakistan laughs it off and lets time run its course.
This attitude has zero returns for Pakistan. Today, it is virtually a pariah in the community of nations. It has no credibility. Many Pakistanis are beginning to question the costs of this policy. It is one thing to pursue 'national interests', it is another to resort to senseless violence as an instrument of national policy. It is an act of supreme folly to axe yourself just so that you can hold up 'ghairat'.
The gains from a stop to the export of terror are immediate to Pakistan. They are both local and global. But the status quo is assured - now the Pakistani establishment has begun to index various other territories, besides Kashmir, to 'progress'. Each time India will be blamed.
Denial, blame and irresponsibility are the pillars of this policy set forth by the establishment. Expect India to 'move on" - it already is - to a better place with or without progress with its neighbor.
Mr. Fatemi says: "India, however, has to move away from its obsession with the Mumbai attacks and accept Pakistan’s assurances of corrective measures."
What a callous statement! How can you call it an obsession? Pakistan has been funding, training, infiltrating terrorists into India for three decades and killed over 40,000 people, Mumbai being the most recent one. Why shouldn't India feel truly outraged at this state-sponsored terror?
As for the author's statement, "India needs to calm these concerns by reducing its involvement in Balochistan and appreciating Pakistan’s worries about India’s increasing presence in Afghanistan.", this has been an ISI propaganda. There has been absolutely no proof of this. As for involvement in Afghanistan, it should be up to Afghans and not Pakistan. In any event, why should Pakistan complain about this when it invites China to use Pakistan as a base to destabilize India, as has been happening for five decades?
Facts show that it is Pakistan that has been obsessed with India for ever since its creation.
Having said that, I do sincerely wish for peaceful and cooperative relations between the two neighbors.
What is required for Pakistan to reduce their force strength at their border with India and remove the threat by non state actord and recall the non state actors in Kashmir. Then India can draw down their troops and create further freedom for inter Kashmir movement of people. Once Kashmir is in restive state both countries should concetrate on trade which will provide prosperity to the people of Pakistan. In the mean time the two governments can sit down and negotiate starting with minor problems and build confidence in the process and gradually move on to more difficult conflicts and finally Kashmir. Please do not expect India to hand over Kashmir on a silver platter. It was ceded to India. The best will be the LOC as the International border and the people of the two parts of Kashmir free to travel freely within Kashmir and no more stoking the fire of indipendance .If indiendence is the ultimate, then both Pakistan and India could provide the whole of Kashmir internal self rule with hands off as to how Kashmir rules internally and both are jointly responsible for foreign affairs. Kashmir should have their own police force drawn from within that has only Kashmiries muslims and hindus alike. Defence should a combined Pakistan India affair.
The author is asking Indians to forget Mumbai!
This is what goes for a "moderate" pak.
If there is another Mumbai by Pakistani terrorsts, we will be again asked to forget and move on.
@Anup:
absolutely agree. Ms Rao is just trying to score a few brownie points as she moves to new (promoted) role as US Ambassador. She is basically telling her bosses - "See what a great job I've done as Foreign Secretary" - and signing off on a positive note for her own benefit. Indian bureaucrat are past masters in playing the brownie points game. This qeers the pitch for her successor though - who will probably discover things were not so hunky-dory after all!
Until Chidambaram and Mukherjee who are actually on the receiving front of Pakistani terror as senior Home and Finance/Internal ministers says terrorism from Pakistan has subsided, nobody will believe a word of Ms Rao.
Sir, might I suggest a more likely motivation than US pressure or actual thawing to Ms Rao's statement. She is moving on from the job of foreign secretary and this was something she said to help her career and score brownie points with the PM. Until one hears something similar from Mr Mukherjee or Mr Chidambaram, one is skeptical of any real change.
I do not believe there will be any real change because there is no appetite for change amongst the Indian people. Poll after poll show that very small percentages of India actually supports better relations with Pakistan. The Mumbai attacks as you rightly pointed out have pretty much silenced the people pushing for a quick fix to the relationship. Arundhati Roy and her left wing cohorts do not represent popular or even liberal opinion anymore. The PM is pretty much isolated in his own government on dialogue with Pakistan.
A better relationship can only come when Pakistan makes a big gesture to show it is serious about tackling the India specific terror groups. Handing over the Mumbai accused and Dawood Ibrahim would probably be enough to get a larger chunk of the Indian public supporting better ties. Barring this the status quo will continue where both countries focus on more pressing issues till the inevitable terror attack in an Indian city causes a fresh round of tensions and a new round of diplomatic and economic reprisals by India on Pakistan.
" Both need to recognise that the establishment of goodwill and the beginning of cooperative relations would bring great benefits to them, while a continuation of hostility is likely to be harmful to both, possibly more to Pakistan though, given India’s size, military strength and growing economic progress. "
So peace is being sought, not for the sake of peace itself, but because temporary peace will bring dividends to Pakistan, so that it can recover from its current mess and then when things get better, raise the Kashmir issue again.
Actually the hostility is quite welcome. A major I know remarked that thanks to Pakistan, Indian troops are kept battle ready by rotating them in and out of Kashmir.
Pakistan was created on the notion that the Muslims of undivided India cannot live with their Hindu neighbours for reasons which have been articulated umpteenth time, so no need to repeat it. Fair enough. Now, how can you be friends with those very people whom you couldn't TRUST as a neighbour. I thought TRUST is one of the pillars of FRIENDSHIP.
I disagree with the authors contention that India has moved beyond Mumbai -- I would argue that India is playing to the World stage knowing that the Pakistani military won't permit the govt to concede much (if anything) during the peace negotiations. Both parties will walk away from the negotiations with nothing accomplished. In this case no progress is still a win for India as the World will view them as taking the high road while Pakistan will reinforce their already poor image.