
Budget debate is meant for lawmakers to engage in a healthy discussion on the fiscal measures proposed by the government before giving them the parliamentary nod. For perspective, American president’s budget proposals only form a wish list, like a set of New Year resolutions, and Congress consideration of these recommendations is merely a starting point in a long budget debate that actually turns the American president’s proposals into a serious framework for legislation. In sheer contrast, our lawmakers — belonging both to the treasury and opposition benches — appeared least bothered about utlising this valuable time for meaningful engagement with each other in the interest of the common man and instead took the opportunity for settling petty political scores with each other.
While the budget debate did eventually get under way, Shehbaz rejected the budget calling it IMF-led and IMF-dictated. Shehbaz, as well as PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, have already made it known that they would do everything not to let the budget sail through the National Assembly even though the parliamentary numbers don’t speak in their favour.
Published in The Express Tribune, June 20th, 2019.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ