Two pilots killed in Vietnam military plane crash

Crash site blocked off for investigation


Afp June 14, 2019
All in a row: Vietnam's military arsenal is largely supplied by longtime ally Russia. PHOTO: AFP

HANOI: Two pilots were killed in Vietnam on Friday after their military plane crashed during a training session, an official told AFP.

Though Vietnam has a good civilian aviation record, airplane and helicopter crashes are regularly reported in the military, which relies on an arsenal of imported equipment -- mostly from longtime ally Russia.

The two pilots in central Khanh Hoa province died when their Russian two-seater training aircraft Yakovlev Yak-52 crashed near a mountain, killing one of them instantly.

"One was found dead while the other one died on the way to hospital," said Nguyen Ngoc Khue, the head of the local commune where the accident occurred.

Two Indian fighter pilots die in Mirage crash

The crash site was blocked off for investigation, Khue added, and photos in state media showed plumes of smoke billowing from the downed plane.

The Yak-52 took its first flight in 1976 in Russia and was later manufactured in Romania by Aerostar. It was designed to train civilian sport pilots and military pilots in the former Soviet Union.
Friday's crash follows several similar accidents in the communist country in recent years.

In July 2018, two pilots were killed when training in central Nghe An province in a Russian-made Sukhoi Su-22 that belonged to Vietnam's Air Defence Force.

At least 14 people were reported killed in military crashes in 2016.
Vietnam is seeking to modernise its military equipment by purchasing more equipment from partners beyond old Soviet ally Russia, including from France, Germany and Israel.

US President Donald Trump has also encouraged Hanoi to buy more American equipment to narrow a trade gap.
Observers say Vietnam is willing to do so, but could struggle to afford US military hardware.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ