Authors of the paper said they analysed the short-run impact of Trump’s actions and found that imports from targeted countries declined 31.5% while targeted US exports fell by 11%. They also found that annual consumer and producer losses from higher costs of imports totalled $68.8 billion.
US and China seek deal to prevent trade-war escalation
“After accounting for higher tariff revenue and gains to domestic producers from higher prices, the aggregate welfare loss was $7.8 billion,” or 0.04% of GDP, the researchers said. The study was authored by a team of economists at the University of California Berkeley, Columbia University, Yale University and University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) and published by the National Bureau of Economic research.
Having dubbed himself the “tariff man,” Trump pledged on both the campaign trail and as president to reduce the trade deficit by shutting out unfairly traded imports and renegotiating free trade agreements. Trump has pursued a protectionist trade agenda to shield US manufacturing. Washington and Beijing have been locked in a tit-for-tat tariff battle for months as imposing unilateral tariffs to combat, and Trump has imposed tariffs that have roiled the European Union and other major trading partners.
US-China trade war: Pakistan gets chance to boost exports of food products
The authors said while US tariffs favoured sectors located in “politically competitive” counties, the retaliatory tariffs imposed on US goods have offset the benefits to these areas.
Published in The Express Tribune, March 17th, 2019.
Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.
COMMENTS (1)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ