US regulators discuss fining Facebook for privacy violations

The Federal Trade Commission has been investigating Facebook since last year


Reuters January 19, 2019
Persons hold smartphones with the Facebook logo in front of displayed "top secret" and "email" words in this picture illustration taken December 6, 2018. PHOTO: REUTERS

US regulators have met to discuss imposing a fine against Facebook for violating a legally binding agreement with the government to protect the privacy of personal data, the Washington Post reported on Friday, citing three people familiar with the discussions.

The Federal Trade Commission has been investigating Facebook since last year. It has not finalised its findings in the probe or the total amount of the penalty, according to the newspaper.

Facebook building a ‘war room’ to battle election meddling

Facebook has talked with FTC staff about the investigation, one of the people familiar with the matter told the Post.

However, it is unclear if the company would settle with the FTC by accepting a significant financial penalty, which is expected to be much larger than the $22.5 million fine the agency imposed on Alphabet’s Google in 2012, the report said.

Facebook declined to comment.

The FTC, which is affected by the US government shutdown, did not immediately respond to a request to comment. Generally secretive, it took the unusual step last March of announcing the opening of an investigation into Facebook’s privacy practices.

Facebook teaches New Yorkers about privacy at ‘pop-up’ kiosk

The announcement followed news reports that revealed lax oversight by the social media company had enabled a quiz app on Facebook to gather details on 87 million users and share it with now-defunct British political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica.

Facebook has since acknowledged several other lapses in protecting user data, drawing additional scrutiny from regulators around the world.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ