At war with itself

When the interests of rulers are in foreign lands it is unreasonable to expect them to fight for the rights of people.


Naeem Sadiq May 31, 2011

Never before has a nuclear state been invaded twice in the same month. But the most disappointing aspect of these invasions was not the loss of assets, but the loss of any sense of remorse, regret, shame or sorrow. Responses like “there had been no breach of security”, “they took advantage of the darkness” and “it was a failure of all the nations of the world”, reflect not just ineptitude and shamelessness but also deceptiveness and delusion — a refusal to acknowledge that Pakistan is finally at a full-blown war with itself.

Pakistan is often compared with a terminally ill patient in an ICU, whose attendants have either abandoned him or are engaged in pursuits that have nothing to do with his well-being. While it may be a sad and painful comparison, acknowledging the existence and nature of the disease is vital to any set of subsequent corrective actions. Unfortunately, those who make our vital decisions continue to live in a state of denial and are not willing to face harsh realities.

Even as the vital signs drop and the options truncate, Pakistan could still take a series of steps to change course. Insisting on delinquent behaviours and ignoring the real issues for the past several decades has left Pakistan with increasingly bitter and complex choices. The 40,000, or so, madrassas need to be closed down and replaced with regular schools that provide free (and good) education, food and books — not an easy task for a government whose own schooling system is rotten and dysfunctional. The ulemas and imams spreading hate, supporting militancy or issuing fatwas, of any sort, should be firmly taken to task. Pakistan needs a complete deweaponisation of all segments of society and all kinds of weapons (licensed or otherwise). A government that has encouraged private armies and militant gangs by issuing at least 83,679 arms licenses in the last three years will surely find it difficult to even begin a serious dialogue on this subject.

There is a need to ensure that every vehicle on the road is registered, has an approved number plate and can be traced to a legitimate owner. In Karachi alone, there are at least 5,000 illegal or stolen vehicles with fake or no number plates.

The irresistible addiction to foreign loans and their wasteful spending has produced a breed of leaders who are dependent, subservient and have sold out to foreign lenders. Saying no to all loans may, therefore, be the first step towards a healing process. The state must also shed its tendency to assume the responsibility for making laws that define what is Islamic and what is not. Pakistan is the only state in the world whose corrupt and fake degree-holding parliament decides who is a Muslim and who is not.

Pakistan needs to stop pampering its lawbreaking and tax-avoiding ruling elite, and shift the focus of all development to the well-being of its underprivileged classes. This could happen if the military were to be trimmed to become lean and efficient instead of fat and sloppy. A thinly-spread army, elements of which, according to the perception of many, may be supporting ‘jihadis’ is not in the interest of Pakistan or the rest of the world.

Pakistanis are rapidly beginning to realise that they are utterly unsafe in the hands of those who run the state and its security apparatus. Perhaps when the interests, residences and money of the rulers are in foreign lands, it is unreasonable to expect them to fight for the territory or the rights of the ordinary people. The present set of rulers will therefore make none of the changes suggested above and will only continue to do more of the same. It is hence time to demand a change of crew if Pakistan is to have a half-decent chance of recovery. Should not the president, the prime minister, the defence minister, the interior minister, the three service chiefs and the ISI chief, who have lost the trust of the people of Pakistan, be asked to resign? In a more civilised country this would have already happened — and that too, voluntarily.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 1st, 2011.

E-Publications

Most Read

COMMENTS (9)

Humaity | 10 years ago | Reply A country created for people to live as equal citizens was usurped by its opposers and wrongly claimed as having been created in the name of religion. They made a Frankenstein of the vision. The monster is now in the self destruct mode.
Alsahdiq | 10 years ago | Reply The humankind is his own enemy. Who is there who has not heard these words of wisdom? So many wellwishers of the people have come and gone, pleading with the masses to come together, to work together for the common good. Such wonderful words of wisdom have fallen on deaf ears. So the humankind will and must suffer. Suffer the consequences of its own making. Everything the people endure, is of their own making. It is the deeds of a person what make or break him or her. It is the deeds of the nation which make or break the nation. We are a nation hell bent on breaking ourselves. To cut short, the question is "Do we as a nation, want a change"? If we want the change as we do, we must initially change our habits. We must trade our bad habits for the good habiits. Arrogance, Avarice and Envy are mosr despised habits. Despised by the human, despised by Lord Almighty. We must get rid of such habits and launch a campaign for everyone to do the same. We should stop looking for a leader. We shall never get another one. The true Leader has come and gone 1400 years ago. The leadership is there for those who want it left by that Leader. Collective leadership of the intellectuals among the masses is the best way to do things. Coming together to work for common good is absolute commonsense and has been prescribed by the Lord. Consulting each other is also commonsense and also prescribed by the Lord. So coming together to do good work is absolute must for the people. If we want a change we must start coming together in our localities from this very evening. Alternatively we can leave our destiny into the hands of all the undesirables and suffer as we do. We simply have no other choice. So what is there that stops people to come forward to join hands with the people of their neighbourhood to come to unite and do good work for all and to look after the interests of all the people? What is there that stops people from being progressing in this competetive world? What? The people who became winners 1400 years ago did just that and from nothing became something. So what are we waiting for. Do we not want to become winners? To become winners we must follow into the footsteps of those Arabs who made themsleves winners. They became winners just because they gave up all their bad habits and embraced all the good habits that make people popular and thus winners. The choice is ours. If we want to remain slaves of the undesirable we should do nothing, but if we want change, we must come out to work for it. Sorry, there is no other choice. We need to work, we have to work. Nothing comes without working for it.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ