Kamran Akmal blames Arthur, Sarfraz for harsh treatment

Wicketkeeper-batsman feels cronyism is prevailing within Pakistan cricket


News Desk September 01, 2018
PHOTO: AFP

Pakistan wicketkeeper-batsman Kamran Akmal has blamed national team captain Sarfraz Ahmed and Head Coach Mickey Arthur for showing bias in team selections.

Speaking at the National Stadium in Karachi, Akmal said that the captain and coach have a major say on which players make it into the squad while Chief Selector Inzamamul Haq does not seem to command any authority while making such decisions.

“These days, only the coach and captain decide who plays in the side,” he said. “It seems that the chief selector does not have major say in such decisions although the decision should be unanimously taken by all three.”

An emotional Akmal further said that it seems only a miracle will get him a chance in the side, stating: “Should I burn my kit bag or hit myself with a bat? Perhaps the only time I will come under reckoning is courtesy a miracle.”

Kohli rested, Sharma to lead India in Asia Cup


The 36-year-old — who will be representing WAPDA in the Quaid-e-Azam Trophy this season — also thinks that he can play in the future as he still has a lot to offer for Pakistan cricket.

“My fitness and performance is there for everyone to see,” he said. “I don’t think my cricket playing days are over yet.”

Akmal, who has scored over 6000 runs for the Men in Green, also criticised the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) for issuing notices even when players are raising voice for their due rights.

“If I am going to raise voice for my rights, a notice will be served in response,” he lamented.

COMMENTS (3)

SHAH S | 5 years ago | Reply @Fahad: YES, by the way, you forgot all those numerous run outs and stumping foul ups.. which made us lose matches;
Fahad | 5 years ago | Reply Scored 6000 runs and probably have dropped 12000 catches.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ