Pakistan — where is it heading?

Published: May 29, 2011

LONDON: This is with reference to Shaukat Qadir’s article of May 28 titled “Where are we headed.”

The fact of the matter is that China is not going to risk its $3 trillion foreign currency reserve and $250 billion annual trade surplus with the US, to make threats to Washington on Pakistan’s behalf. And in any case, China didn’t make any threat to the US, all it said was something to the effect that states shouldn’t interfere in other the US. And in any case, why do we need to play one country against another one to begin with? As for the ‘Afghan freedom struggle’, the Taliban are not exactly popular in Afghanistan, and are viewed as Pakistani proxies by many in that country. .

How about the Pakistani state, for once taking some responsibility and not placing all the blame on America? The Pakistani people expect its security apparatus to keep them safe, regardless of who the perpetrators or motivating factors are. The writer should stop peddling the fallacy that if the US leaves, terrorism will end. Do we really think that Punjab-based terroist organisations and sectarian outfits will care if the US leaves the region? Do we really think that groups, which want to establish a state in Pakistan along the lines that the Taliban imposed on Afghanistan will stop with their designs just because America has left?

Syed Nadir El-Edroos

Published in The Express Tribune, May 30th, 2011.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (2)

  • friend
    May 30, 2011 - 12:20AM

    you are a sane guy…i totally agree!Recommend

  • Arindom
    May 30, 2011 - 2:04AM

    Absolute nail on the head : why does Pakistan always have to play one country against another? – This policy has already made Pakistan run out of countries!!
    Why can’t Pakistan simply play for itself?Recommend

More in Letters