Consider the case of NA-21 (Mardan-II). Amir Haider Azam Khan of the Awami National Party (ANP) won the election in this National Assembly constituency bagging 78,911 votes and Mohammad Atif of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) was the runner-up with 78,878 votes. While the margin of victory is a mere 33 votes, the number of votes that were turned down stood at 5,790. This very low margin of victory amid this high number of invalid votes is understood to expect the trailing candidate to ask for a recount. There are at least two National Assembly constituencies, according to the ECP data, where the number of rejected votes is in excess of 15,000.
The matter of rejected votes may well be rooted in poor election day arrangements, besides the lack of voter education. But a smaller victory margin, in comparison with higher number of rejected votes, has provided room for the losing candidates in many constituencies to raise allegations of partiality. And since recount requests have been approved only in selected cases — despite the law clearly allowing a recount if the margin of victory is less than 5% of the total votes polled in the constituency or 10,000 votes — it is adding to the complaints of rigging and fraud. Whether the allegations fit the definition of partiality or election fraud is a matter of probe, but a question mark hangs over the credibility of the Election 2018. The ECP needs to at least take the recount requests seriously and dispose them of to the satisfaction of the complainants.
Published in The Express Tribune, July 31st, 2018.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS (2)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ