World's rich grow richer as bull markets roar on, study suggests

Residents of North America hold greatest share of personal wealth at almost 43 per cent


Reuters June 14, 2018
Tourists walk up one of the main shopping areas, Preciados Street, in central Madrid, Spain, June 14, 2018. PHOTO: REUTERS

ZURICH: Personal financial wealth swelled 12 per cent last year to nearly $202 trillion (151.58 trillion pounds), the strongest growth in five years as bull markets and the dollar’s weakening against most major currencies boosted global fortunes, a study showed on Thursday.

Adjusted for exchange rate swings, global wealth rose 7 per cent.

While residents of North America held the greatest share of personal wealth at almost 43 per cent, the fastest growth came in Asia, Latin America and the Middle East. Most super-rich individuals lived in the United States, China and Japan.

The consulting group’s annual study showed Switzerland remained the world’s biggest centre for managing offshore wealth with $2.3 trillion, followed by Hong Kong with $1.1 trillion and Singapore with $0.9 trillion.

Rupee stable against dollar 

The two Asian centres have grown at yearly rates of 11 and 10 per cent respectively over the past five years, more than three times the three per cent rate Switzerland has posted.

“Over the next five years, offshore wealth seems likely to continue growing at a [compound annual growth rate] of roughly five per cent per year,” it added.

It is in the fast-growing markets that large wealth managers including Swiss banks UBS (UBSG.S) and Credit Suisse (CSGN.S) are casting wider nets.

The Swiss banking secrecy from which they long profited has been weakened, meaning rich people from around the world can no longer easily use the Alpine Republic to stash wealth away from tax authorities at home.

The changes have put Switzerland in fierce competition with faster-growing centres like Hong Kong and Singapore.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ