Advances in engineering education in Pakistan — I

With 10 per cent of applicants passing competitive tests in social sciences indicated how weak the subject had become.


Attaur Rahman May 17, 2011
Advances in engineering education in Pakistan — I

Engineering represents the backbone of any country aspiring to migrate to a knowledge economy. The strengthening of engineering, education and research leads to national self-reliance, as it creates the necessary strengths in many fields through the development of indigenous capabilities for manufacturing machinery used in industry and agriculture, as well as sophisticated defence equipment that can be used within a country or exported to earn valuable foreign exchange.

When I was appointed as the minister of science and technology in March 2000, and later became the founding chairman of the HEC in October 2002, it was decided to give the highest priority to engineering sciences. The following steps taken have considerably strengthened the engineering sector in Pakistan, although we still have a long way to go.

Firstly, it was decided that the ministry of science and technology should start funding programmes in the higher education sector with a focus on engineering education — this was a sharp departure from the previous practice, as the ministry had previously funded institutions under its own fold, such as the Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (PCSIR). It was felt that science and engineering could not be strong in Pakistan without a critical mass of high quality scientists and engineers, and that this was only possible if our engineering, and other, universities were strengthened. Endowments were, therefore, created for every public sector engineering university. The concept of creating endowments by the government through its development funds did not previously exist in Pakistan. The ministry of finance and the planning division were, in general, opposed to the idea, as they felt that this would block the funds unnecessarily. However, we felt that it would provide long-term sustainability to universities instead of sporadic assistance through development projects. We, therefore, pushed the idea through, and each public sector engineering university was given endowments, ranging from Rs100 million to Rs200 million, to promote their masters and PhD programmes. Till 2002, all our engineering universities had hardly produced 10 PhDs in 55 years (as compared to about 3,000 PhDs produced by the Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi in the same period) — a shameful situation. They were wrongly labelled as ‘universities’ — they were really low-level colleges, since a university is judged by its creativity, reflected from its output of high quality publications in reputable international journals, international patents, PhD output and international recognition of its contributions.

Secondly, as chairman of the HEC, I decided to focus on strengthening the faculty in engineering at our universities. Thus, out of the 5,000 foreign scholarships approved, about 2,000 scholarships were for engineering sciences (at a cost of about Rs18 billion for the engineering scholarships, with about Rs9 million being spent on each student over a five-year period). Economics and social sciences were also given a priority with about 35 per cent of the scholarships allocated to these disciplines, but only about 10 per cent of the applicants in social sciences actually succeeded in passing the competitive tests, indicating how weak the social sciences had become. A four year undergraduate programme was introduced, instead of the previous two year programme, with the aim to strengthen basic sciences, humanities and social sciences so that students receive a broad-based education.

Thirdly, projects worth between Rs3 billion to Rs10 billion, for strengthening facilities and faculty, were approved for each engineering university. The result: Today, out of all Pakistan’s universities, the institutions that have achieved high international rankings are all engineering universities (for example, NUST is at 274 in the world and UET Lahore is at 281 in engineering sciences). No Pakistani university had been able to reach such world rankings previously, so this was a great leap forward. Mehran Engineering University is also ranked among the top 400 in Pakistan, while COMSATS has been coming up very fast and has already attained number six position in the ranking of universities in Pakistan. The NED University of Engineering and Technology has been slow in establishing a strong research base and, is now, lagging far behind newcomers such as NUST, UET (Lahore), Mehran Engineering University, as well as COMSATS.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 18th, 2011.

COMMENTS (41)

M. Uzair Sukhera | 13 years ago | Reply @Anjum H Have you studied the model by King fahd university (saudia)? Try visit it please.Such models do work!.... Why wont such institutes share their faculty? (ofcourse i know the overall situation on Pakistan) but Pakistani grads from abroad do have to get some right places to head back for decent research, career and salaries. right? The reason my colleagues at IVY league universities are thinking to go back to Pakistan as professors after PHD is sole reason that now such positions offer decent perks and have the right research environment to offer a decent alternative to Pakistani PHDs (from abroad) @Pakistan Khan Dear Mr. Pakistan Khan (who even doesn't care using real name!) Graduates from NUST and UET compete with rest of the world at equal levels and stand out in academic distinctions and awards. I can provide you stats! ... So you better base your comments on facts. International rankings aren't any shams. If they rank MIT 1 will you start questioning why next day? Please presents some facts to support your claims. Grow up! For your info. Graduates from UET and NUST are at top level positions in engineering sector in country.... Now will you ask me that all engineering companies in Pakistan are bunch of technicians? @White Russian (another one with sham name)... - The topic of discussion here is higher education. If you want to discuss primary education better go talk to education ministry... - PHDs are important to improve quality of graduate education. Which gives a vital workforce to lift your industry. Reason why we suck and havent been able to deliver they way Indians have captured global market has lesser higher engineering education (being one of the primary reasons.) You can go check out stats about patents from the graduates of Indian schools and compare them to Pakistani ones. When you are competing to the world such things are really important. - Your claim that spending on PHDs has no value? We compete equally with the world! (atleast our top notch.) True we have lesser resources and far less quality, but this doesnt mean you shouldn't invest into PHDs... Who's making Intel, Microsoft, Facebook and all tech gurus profitable? PHDs who are their asset! Better check facts. (Again there is circular logic... Less you invest in PHDs lesser will be the quality of the graduating PHDs. Something you complain about in their PHD Defense). - As per your last comment. Yes its over ten years now... PHDs from IVY and good universities takes 5-6 years. PHDs have just started to return back to Pakistan and are formulating excellent labs at NUST, UET and LUMS equally. Be patient for results. See here for proof: http://seecs.nust.edu.pk/research_groups/groups/index.php @Saleem Khan: NUST wasn't put first. It was QU. Later QU retracted it as QU was ranked in Mechanical which even doesn't exist there. Rankings do have factual errors! (but they fixed it later... ) @Zubair A. Farooq Dear Sir. Though i truly agree with your proposition for open accountability of funds yet your remark 'being run by military' doesnt disqualify the good that exists out there. No matter how much did i criticize the military while studying at NUST, yet i do not agree with you that the quality is rubbish. Its not high standard, no one says so (the ranking itself suggests it) but you must give the devil its due. Try visiting the H-12 campus of NUST. (I know a lot of tax payers money has gone there) but the graduates are now global and at all the best institutes (Including faculty at MIT). @Saudi Rules: Go study HEC website to learn criteria please!... Ofcourse it uses testing procedures etc. Not everyone sent was a rich 'poor'. Many were deserving candidates who went to reputed institutes. And please check stats. Not every foreign universities offer aid. Let me know off the aid that IVY league gives at Masters level? (they do at PhD).
Lobster | 13 years ago | Reply Criticizing number of Phds do not really know the process.Its due to HEC, most of the Pakistanis are enrolled in foreign universities in PhD programs. If a reputed foreign university awards PhD to a guy, do you consider them weak? Good work Dr. sahab
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ