
The advisory firm wants both amnesty schemes to be implemented in the interest of fair play and avoid the impression that it was implicitly discriminatory to honest and dutiful taxpayers. This is fuzzy logic at its best because the advisory firm recognises the weakness of the offshore amnesty vis-a-vis the Financial Action Task Force, which is unlikely to take a sympathetic view of the offshore scheme, and yet argues for a domestic amnesty scheme.
An amnesty scheme is only good if it successfully repatriates cash back into the national treasury that would otherwise stay parked outside. A sum of Rs100 billion is indeed an attractive addition. But can it be done?
Experience has not shown that it can. Nearly half of the parallel economy is believed to be held in the real estate sector. A government amnesty designed earlier for the real estate sector brought little or no significant improvement in state revenues. So it is back to the drawing board?
Published in The Express Tribune, April 4th, 2018.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ