Senators to force vote against US involvement in Yemen war
Lawmakers urge US withdrawal from the conflict
WASHINGTON:
US lawmakers on Wednesday launched a bipartisan effort to end American involvement in Saudi Arabia's conflict with Yemen, an extraordinary attempt to force a vote on whether to over-rule presidential military authorisation.
The United Nations has described Yemen, the poorest country in the Middle East, as the world's largest humanitarian disaster.
More than 9,200 people have been killed and tens of thousands wounded in Yemen's three-year-old war, which is seen as both a civil conflict and a proxy war between regional titans Saudi Arabia and Iran.
Iran says UN's Yemen vote "another defeat for US"
Since 2015 Washington has provided weapons, intelligence and aerial refueling for a Saudi-led coalition which has conducted air strikes against Houthi rebels.
Senators Bernie Sanders, Mike Lee and Chris Murphy said in a joint statement that their resolution would force the first-ever vote in the Senate "to withdraw US armed forces from an unauthorized war."
"We believe that, as Congress has not declared war or authorized military force in this conflict, the United States involvement in Yemen is unconstitutional and unauthorized, and US military support of the Saudi coalition must end," said Sanders, who is an independent but ran for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016.
President Donald Trump's top military and diplomatic advisers said last October that the administration was not seeking new authority for conducting military operations in the world's hot spots.
Congress first passed an authorisation to use military force, or AUMF, on September 14, 2001 - three days after the devastating attacks on New York and Washington by Al-Qaeda hijackers.
Since then, presidents George W. Bush, Barack Obama and now Trump have relied on the order's authority, along with a subsequent AUMF in 2002, as they launched operations against armed militant groups in far-flung battle zones around the world.
Russia vetoes Western bid at UN to pressure Iran over Yemen
Several Democrats, and some Republicans, have warned that the 15-year-old authorities are licenses for endless US military engagement.
Lee, a conservative Republican, said the measure can help Congress reassert its power over foreign policy decision-making.
"It can authorise - or decline to authorise - military engagement and define US national interests," Lee said.
The four-page measure notes that according to the 1973 War Powers Resolution, if US forces are engaged in hostilities outside the country absent a declaration of war, "such forces shall be removed by the president if the Congress so directs."
The measure is invoking the provisions of a little-known bill that can force a Senate floor vote on such a privileged resolution.
A similar effort, introduced last year in the House by two Democrats and two Republicans, has 50 cosponsors.
US lawmakers on Wednesday launched a bipartisan effort to end American involvement in Saudi Arabia's conflict with Yemen, an extraordinary attempt to force a vote on whether to over-rule presidential military authorisation.
The United Nations has described Yemen, the poorest country in the Middle East, as the world's largest humanitarian disaster.
More than 9,200 people have been killed and tens of thousands wounded in Yemen's three-year-old war, which is seen as both a civil conflict and a proxy war between regional titans Saudi Arabia and Iran.
Iran says UN's Yemen vote "another defeat for US"
Since 2015 Washington has provided weapons, intelligence and aerial refueling for a Saudi-led coalition which has conducted air strikes against Houthi rebels.
Senators Bernie Sanders, Mike Lee and Chris Murphy said in a joint statement that their resolution would force the first-ever vote in the Senate "to withdraw US armed forces from an unauthorized war."
"We believe that, as Congress has not declared war or authorized military force in this conflict, the United States involvement in Yemen is unconstitutional and unauthorized, and US military support of the Saudi coalition must end," said Sanders, who is an independent but ran for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2016.
President Donald Trump's top military and diplomatic advisers said last October that the administration was not seeking new authority for conducting military operations in the world's hot spots.
Congress first passed an authorisation to use military force, or AUMF, on September 14, 2001 - three days after the devastating attacks on New York and Washington by Al-Qaeda hijackers.
Since then, presidents George W. Bush, Barack Obama and now Trump have relied on the order's authority, along with a subsequent AUMF in 2002, as they launched operations against armed militant groups in far-flung battle zones around the world.
Russia vetoes Western bid at UN to pressure Iran over Yemen
Several Democrats, and some Republicans, have warned that the 15-year-old authorities are licenses for endless US military engagement.
Lee, a conservative Republican, said the measure can help Congress reassert its power over foreign policy decision-making.
"It can authorise - or decline to authorise - military engagement and define US national interests," Lee said.
The four-page measure notes that according to the 1973 War Powers Resolution, if US forces are engaged in hostilities outside the country absent a declaration of war, "such forces shall be removed by the president if the Congress so directs."
The measure is invoking the provisions of a little-known bill that can force a Senate floor vote on such a privileged resolution.
A similar effort, introduced last year in the House by two Democrats and two Republicans, has 50 cosponsors.