China proposes removal of two-term limit for president

Central Committee calls for inserting 'Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism' into the constitution, reports Chinese agency


Reuters February 25, 2018
China's President Xi Jinping claps after his speech as he and other new Politburo Standing Committee members meet with the press at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. PHOTO: REUTERS

BEIJING: China's Central Committee proposed on Sunday to remove a limit of two consecutive terms for the president and vice president, the official Xinhua news agency reported.

The committee proposed removing the clause "shall serve no more than two consecutive terms" from the constitution, Xinhua reported.

The Central Committee also proposed inserting "Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era" into the constitution, Xinhua said in a separate statement, referring to President Xi.

China to enshrine Xi's name in state constitution

Earlier, China’s Communist Party proposed to engrave President Xi Jinping’s guiding philosophy in the country’s constitution, further cementing his status as its most powerful leader in decades.

Xi’s eponymous “thought” was already enshrined in the Communist Party constitution at a major congress in October, elevating him to the same status as modern China’s founder Mao Zedong.

China confirms Xi Jinping as country's most powerful leader since Mao

The architect of China’s economic reforms, Deng Xiaoping, is the only other leader whose name appears alongside his guiding principle in both the state and party constitutions.

The elevation of Xi, 64, into the Communist Party constitution in October had already brought him into the pantheon of the country’s most powerful leaders.

COMMENTS (3)

javed ali | 6 years ago | Reply Hahaha.. Looks like china wants to go downhill from here.
BrainBro | 6 years ago | Reply All Hail Emperor Xi Jinping.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ