“The bank has filed a review petition against the judgment of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in the pension case and has also moved an application for constitution of a larger bench which has been accepted,” NBP President Saeed Ahmad said at a briefing on Tuesday.
“Pending the decision of review petition, financial impact of the subject case has not been included in the financial statements as the bank looks forward to a favourable outcome of the case,” he said.
In a first, Pakistan to send trans persons as Hajj volunteers
Besides the legal battle, the bank was also in contact with high officials in Islamabad to gain support.
The bank, however, avoided paying dividend to its shareholders in a bid to remain on the safe side as in case the pending decision of the review petition comes against its expectation then it would be having sufficient money in reserves to pay higher pensions.
Pakistan wins EU praise for meeting GSP Plus criteria
In the recent past, the bank has already increased minimum pension to Rs6,000 from less than Rs1,000. “The decision, if it is against the expectations, would not erode its (bank) capital base,” he said.
Consolidated profit
The bank posted a consolidated profit of Rs23.34 billion for the year ended on December 31, 2017. This was 1% higher than Rs23.08 billion reported in the preceding year.
Earnings per share improved to Rs10.90 compared to Rs10.83 last year.
NBP branch in China
Ahmad said the higher non-performing loan was not allowing the bank to open its branch in China.
On the other hand, the bank cannot remove the non-performing loan from the balance-sheet. “Considering removing the last five-year non-performing loan, the bank is performing better than any foreign bank at world level,” he said.
Published in The Express Tribune, February 21st, 2018.
Like Business on Facebook, follow @TribuneBiz on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ