Currently leading the charge in the fragmentation stakes is the MQM-P which itself emerged from a rift with the London branch of the party and has been in some ferment ever since. Politics is all about personalities and ego — and the dispensation of largesse which is at the heart of the current activity. Specifically, who has the authority to nominate candidates for seats in the Senate, coveted posts that are in the gift or so they think, of the party convener. Another powerful group opines that it is constitutionally mandated to make the nominations and not the party convener. Over the last weekend, matters came to a head (though it is not impossible that temperatures will drop overnight as they have in the past and the fever subside) and an attempt is seemingly underway to oust the convener, a figure directly responsible for the formation of the MQM-P who is not taking things lightly. None of this, in any party, adds to the value-added side of the equation when advancing the democratic experiment. Conversely, if change is being triggered in monolithic political structures, then the outcomes may not be all bad after all.
Published in The Express Tribune, February 13th, 2018.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ