Cricket: Malik excels with all-round show

Shoaib Malik displayed an all-round performance to help CA Sports Sialkot to defeat Pakistan Cricket Club


Express May 05, 2011

Former Pakistan captain Shoaib Malik displayed an all-round performance to help CA Sports Sialkot to defeat Pakistan Cricket Club (PCC) by three wickets in the Pakistan Cricket Twenty20 League. Malik first secured three wickets with his impressive spin bowling as the winners bowled out PCC for 133 runs. Ramiz Raja Junior and Sarfraz Ahmed were the main contributors for PCC. In reply, CA Sports achieved the target after losing seven wickets with Malik chipping in with 27 valuable runs. Ali Khan was the top scorer with 44 runs.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 4th, 2011.

COMMENTS (3)

Arshad Jamal Butt | 13 years ago | Reply @Ahsan: Thats my opinion and i am independent to say any thing in this "Democracy". You can differ but in decent words i can reply in same or worse words than you used but what will be difference between you and me. There is never any proof against corruption of Pakistani Politicians and their record is clean but why Pakistan is burning? Shoaib Malik could not show his foreign accounts details and if you have seen expenditures of his wedding you can easily analyse. You should have close look at media and columns then you would come to know things better. But this is my own analysis and opinion that he is corrupt. crickinfo.com shows record of players not corruption or gambling of players.
Ahsan | 13 years ago | Reply @Arshad Jamal Butt: Woo Wooo Wooooooo What in the hell r u talking about… Malik earned alot of money while he was the captain… Is that what what u r trying to say…. It doesnt matter what u r trying to say… Okkk Check Malik’s captain record mate ( Odis, T20s )and compare it with others… Go on cricinfo.com Get ur facts right my mate…. He deserves his place in the Team…. .
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ