Senate panel asks Centre to announce NFC award

Also call on govt to convene CCI meeting for resolving issues of the provinces


Sohail Khattak January 11, 2018
Also call on govt to convene CCI meeting for resolving issues of the provinces. PHOTO: FILE

PESHAWAR: The Senate’s Functional Committee on Devolution on Thursday demanded of the federal government to announce the National Finance Commission (NFC) Award without any delay and to call a meeting of the Council of Common Interest (CCI) to resolve issues of the provinces.

The committee called upon the Centre to pay arrears to Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) and Balochistan, related to the net hydel profit and gas royalty respectively. It also said that the federal government should declare tobacco a provincial crop rather than a federal one, and establish a separate and independent secretariat for the CCI.

The Senate committee, during a meeting chaired by Senator Mir Kabir in Peshawar, placed the demands through a declaration shared with the media later. It also demanded increase in the Senate’s powers and asked the federal government to devolve the matter of higher education to provinces.

FATA reforms: Provinces averse to sharing receipts from NFC award

Senator Farhatullah Babar of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) highlighted ‘the ongoing encroachment’ on the powers of the federal, provincial and local governments and called for measures to reverse the trend.

“The non-elected establishment is seeking to take over the functions of the elected government. And within the elected structures, the federation is encroaching upon the domain of provinces which in turn are reluctant to give powers to local governments in accordance with the Constitution,” he said.

Babar said the issue of state institutions working within their limits had been thoroughly discussed recently in the Senate, and the chairman reserved his ruling expected to be announced in the forthcoming session of the upper house.

“The provinces should also look inward and devolve powers genuinely to local governments to create a strong moral base for demanding their rights from the federation. Smaller provinces should also join hands in requisitioning meetings of the CCI in case the federation is reluctant to do so,” he added.

Senator Ilyas Bilour of the Awami National Party (ANP) expressed concerns over the no-objection certificate (NOC) needed by the NGOs and foreign delegations for entering K-P.

“K-P is not a no-go area… why is then an NOC mandatory for the NGOs to get to K-P and why does the federal government not issue them the same?” he questioned, saying that the same NGOs could visit and work in other provinces without the NOC.

Senator Tahir Mashhadi of the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) noted that the K-P government gave the committee the cold shoulder on its visit.

PM Abbasi expresses hope to strengthen ties with China

“We are not asking the K-P chief secretary for plots, and have come here to empower them,” he said, asking why the chief secretary was not seeing them. He added that in Sindh the chief minister, his six cabinet members and secretaries received the committee and sat with them.

Senator Usman Kakar said they had reservations over the Constitution.

“Senate has been given lesser powers under the Constitution. We also have reservations over Articles 62and 63 of the Constitution. A judge should not have the powers to declare a person Sadiq and Amin,” he demanded.

He also criticised the federal government for ‘delaying the devolution process’, saying that the federal government was “transferring only those departments to the province which are not fruitful and whose devolution is in its favour”.

Kakar also criticised the federal government for ‘ignoring the smaller provinces’ in the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

Senator Taj Haider said only two provinces would get developed due to the CPEC. Senator Rubina Khalid and Senator Mohsin Aziz also attended the meeting.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ