Protest or pique?

Farzana Versey May 24, 2010

The Islamists and the government of Pakistan have been unable to follow the Holy Quran in spirit, given the laws against women and minorities. The liberals do not make a strong case against local issues. They are busy downloading or uploading videos of people being shot dead by the Taliban, indulging in a titillating form of sadism that whets the voyeuristic appetite for the gruesome violence being perpetrated.

For a while now, Pakistani authorities have been trying to be more loyal than the most devout king. A lot has been written about the blocking of social networking sites that would expose its citizens to images of the Prophet (pbuh) following a cartoon contest. This gave the establishment an opportunity to send out the message to the world that it is seriously an Islamic Republic.

The decision, though questionable, goes beyond freedom of speech, whether it is of the cartoonists or the citizens to access websites. Muslims in other parts of the world do protest, but banning restricts the space of individuals who might have remonstrated using the same websites to make their point. Interestingly, the contest invitation had been up a month ago and there was no outcry then.

For those opposed to such censorship, is it ideological resistance or is it about bored youngsters who will lose out on exchanging notes with friends or checking out photographs? Do they support the idea behind such lampooning? It is unlikely, for they react with vehemence in matters of religion. It may often be a public posture that may have nothing to do with their personal stance, which would qualify as self-censorship. What could be the reason behind putting a muzzle on one’s mouth?

There is a good deal of talk about the Saudi-isation of Pakistan. Dr Pervez Hoodbhoy had to face resistance for encouraging ‘un-Islamic’ ideas in the physics department when he started a film club at the Quaid-e-Azam University. Some students switched off the lights when the brilliant mathematician (portrayed by Russell Crowe) is being seduced by his wife in A Beautiful Mind. Yet, pirated DVDs of Bollywood films sell well. It is not the Saudis, stupid; it is about a Pakistan in denial, fighting its own demons. Wearing certain kinds of clothes or using language in a particular manner does not delete history. Culture is internalised.

When Indian artist M F Husain painted figures of Hindu goddesses, he got threats from hardliner groups at home. The Indian government woke up to support him only when Qatar gave him citizenship. The liberals back him selectively as an upholder of pluralism. Had he conveyed that he portrayed those images for reasons other than ‘knowledge’ and ‘interest in Indian mythology’, he would have been toasted, and not with a bottle of bubbly.

“Has there ever been a society which has died of dissent? Several have died of conformity in our lifetime,” said Jacob Bronowski. Belief systems are conformist and censored paradigms, in that the faithful believe in only the given material. This is why countries like Pakistan cannot fight extremist religious elements within, but in matters of grabbing international eyeballs for an Islamic cause there is no obfuscation. It is time to reach the pique.

Published in the Express Tribune, May 25th, 2010.


P. Vengaayam | 12 years ago | Reply Ms. Sarah, Please do not get annoyed with facts presented -- the way out is to make sure that the right thing is done, not just talked about in great detail with no action, like we do in India and in Pakistan. I can point to news items in the past two days where Pakistani establishment has released the well known terrorist kingpin Hafiz Saeed on "absence of Evidence" -- it is an open secret that he has been the central figure in the Lashkar-e-toiba which has conducted terrorism worldwide. How can outsiders watching the actions of the Pakistani establishment in this manner assume that Pakistan is taking the terrorist problem serious, as you are claiming? You may have heard the old proverb, "Actions speak louder than words". Pakistani leadership talks a lot about resolving its problems but nothing seems to happen on the ground to prove that all the talk is serious talk.
Sarah | 12 years ago | Reply Just a reply to Raakesh You make me laugh.Loudly!I don't need to tell you the countless stories of extreme discrimination, violence and social ostracising of religious minorities in India and don't even get me started on the Indian caste system and the treatment meted out to the "lower castes".Equal opportunities indeed! Please cut out the hypocrisy and accept the truth. And How do YOU "understand" Pakistan? And that too good enough to comment on and judge? Oh and suicide bombing is NOT a Pakistani invention or practice.Go google it and see where it came from.It's an Afghani export to Pakistan, one we DID NOT ask for and making it sound like a 'taana' (taunt) is extremely sad and a cheap shot on your part. To Mr P. Vengaayam The urgency that you refer to is felt THE MOST by US!!PAKISTANIS!!!We are NOT in denial about ANY of our problems and you and rest of the world sitting and commenting, criticising, judging and giving suggestions just proves that IT'S EASIER SAID THAN DONE! YOU don't need to tell US what needs to be done urgently,we know that better than ANY ONE ELSE. And saying that India also has problems is not a form of denial, it's reminding you that you should be hogging your own government to control your TONS of extremists, separatists and terrorists. Or does Naxalites killing your soldiers and police men doesn't matter to you?
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read