At a board meeting in Auckland this month, the International Cricket Council unveiled plans for a long-awaited, nine-nation Test championship in a bid to preserve the five-day format's status following the rapid growth of T20.
Among a raft of other reforms, it also agreed to experiment with four-day Tests, with South Africa and Zimbabwe set to trial the first in December.
But Smith and Warner are not keen, even if the hours and over requirements of each day are extended to reduce disparity with the traditional format.
"Personally, I like five so I would like to keep it at five," said Smith in an interview with cricket.com.au. "Just the traditional way that Test cricket has been played, I think it's great when you get into that fifth day and enter that last hour, I think it's a really cool part of the game."
Warner was even more strident in his opposition, saying: "I have no interest in four-day cricket. You have so many variables in Test match cricket — you've got weather, some games might be only getting three days but it just takes one day to have that weather come in and it can ruin it."
The left-handed opener further said: "Then on the flip-side, it's a Test. It's the longevity, being out there on your legs, it's grit, determination, those things come to my mind to actually want to keep playing five-day cricket. Like a timeless Test (a feature of Test cricket in the 1920s and '30s), it's basically survival of the fittest."
Cricket Australia chief James Sutherland has expressed support for the trial, but indicated earlier this month it was unlikely Australia would take part any time soon.
"We were supportive of the trial... I think it's about learning, it's about innovation, it's about understanding whether these sorts of things can work," he told reporters. "I don't foresee us playing any four-day Test cricket in that window. But that's not to say we don't support the trial. We'll certainly be interested observers."
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ