US ambassador Nikki Haley says veto stands between UNSC membership and India

She also voiced her support towards the 'tougher' approach Trump has taken towards Pakistan


News Desk October 18, 2017
South Carolina Governor Nikki Haley waves as she arrives to address delegates during the second session of the Republican National Convention in Tampa, Florida, August 28, 2012 REUTERS/Mike Segar (UNITED STATES - Tags: POLITICS ELECTIONS)

US ambassador the United Nations Nikki Haley said on Tuesday that the US was open to UN reforms to expand the permanent membership of the UN Security Council, but the key for India to attain it is to “not touch” the issue of veto power that current members are unwilling to share or give up.

Haley also was swift to point out that President Trump’s new South Asian policy was a “tougher approach” towards Pakistan. “We cannot tolerate its government (Pakistan’s) or any other government giving safe haven to terrorists,” she said, reiterating Trump’s call for India to do more in Afghanistan.

US diplomat Nikki Haley says her mother couldn’t be a judge in India because she was a woman

While speaking at a discussion hosted by the advocacy group India-US Friendship Council “is much more about the veto”, she said that the UN reforms “is much more about the veto”. The permanent five who have veto powers – US, UK, France, Russia and China – “none of them want to give that up”.

The “key to getting India on the Security Council would have to be not touch the veto”, Haley who is an Indian-American, added, in a rare public discussion of the American position on India’s claim to a permanent UNSC seat, which was first endorsed by former president Barack Obama in a visit to India in 2010. India has staked a claim to a permanent seat on a reformed UNSC with all the same powers but along with other members of the G-4 pressure group.

Germany, Japan and Brazil have backed deferred and phased rollout of the veto power after a transition period of 15 years. The Trump administration reiterated US support for India during Prime Minister Narendra Modi past June. Vice president Mike Pence chipped in with his support in a speech to a trade body the next day. And, now the US ambassador to UN, which was the first for her, according to India watchers.

However, India is disappointed by the slow pace of the movement on the issue at the UN, as conveyed by officials at the recent UNGA meetings, in the context of secretarial and bureaucratic reforms by its leadership. The US was not opposed to the reforms, Haley said in response to a question. Russia and China were.

US to mediate between Pakistan and India over Kashmir issue

While Russia has backed India’s claim, it has not shown particular enthusiasm about the reforms generally, not taking a position on any of the other claimants. China is the only permanent member not to back India but it has not backed any other country as well. Diplomats concede the two countries together did indeed not seem open to reforms.

On the issue of the veto, the US and UK don’t want to let go of it or share it, only France has said it was open to it. Russia remained ambivalent given its support only for India and China hasn’t even gotten past the first block to even begin to consider the question of sharing or giving up the veto.

COMMENTS (6)

perplexed | 3 years ago | Reply what is the veto for its dictatorship and imperialism in the modern world while hundreds of thousands may die in one part of the world and yet one policitcally motivated may veto against taking action on killers finish the veto, finish injustice
Kamal | 3 years ago | Reply You mean a UN Resolution against atrocities by Hindus against Kashmiri Muslims can be vetoed by India, the perpetrator. Never. The moment India is ever selected as a Permanent Member of the UN Security Council is the day we will attack Indian Kashmir enmasse. Followed immediately by the nuking of top 50 cities of India. Burnt ground for all if the world stands by and watches this epitome of inequality,
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

E-Publications

Most Read