'If Taj Mahal is built by traitors so is Red Fort’: Indian politician to Modi

Published: October 17, 2017
Asaduddin Owaisi. PHOTO: AFP

Asaduddin Owaisi. PHOTO: AFP

An Indian politician has asked PM Modi if he would also stop hosting foreign dignitaries at the state capital’s iconic Hyderabad House, because that, too, was built by “traitors”.

Asaduddin Owaisi, a key member of the All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen (AIMIM) had a stinging response to a BJP MLA saying that the Taj Mahal was built by a “traitor”.

Do you want to destroy the Taj Mahal? Top court asks Modi govt

According to the Times of India, a video of Sangeet Som, a UP BJP legislator, recently emerged in which he is claiming that the Taj Mahal is not part of the Indian culture and should not be either, because the man who built it, Shah Jahan, “tried to wipe out Hindus”.

He added that Mughal emperors Babur, Akbar and Aurangzeb were “traitors”. Som, though, indicated he does not believe the Taj Mahal should be a historical site.

The AIMIM’s Owaisi is not the only person critical of Som’s comments. The Samajwadi Party and the National Conference also slammed him.

National Conference’s Omar Abdullah also wondered if people looked forward to Narendra Modi addressing the nation on Independence Day from New Delhi’s Nehru Stadium instead of from the ramparts of the Red Fort.

An S Samajwadi Party spokesperson said the Taj must not be dragged into any controversies. “Don’t create controversy around Taj Mahal. It brings [a] lot of revenue.”

India’s saffron tide may be eroding away Taj Mahal

Commenting on a recent dropping of the monument from a list of Uttar Pradesh’s historical sites, Som wondered why it should be considered part of Indian culture and history.

“Many were sad when the Taj Mahal was removed from the list of historical places. What kind of history? What place’s history? Whose history? The history that the man who built the Taj Mahal imprisoned his father? The history that he wanted to wipe out the Hindus from all of Uttar Pradesh and India?” asked the BJP MLA.


This story originally appeared on the Times of India.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (2)

  • Asif
    Oct 17, 2017 - 12:50PM

    Taj is part of a continuum that will make bjp irrelevant. Recommend

  • aijaz gula
    Oct 17, 2017 - 2:26PM

    As for origin of Urdu, it was also known as Zaban-e-rekhta(broken language or language of soldiers). The Mughals used Persian (Farsi) and Persian was their court language. Urdu today
    is a bouquet of Persian( Farsi,),Arabic, English,Sanskrit and lot more.It is live and keeps changing with the passage of time. Recommend

More in World