Honouring contracts

Concrete manifestations of broken promises, breached agreements, dishonoured contracts litter the national landscape


Tausif Kamal October 04, 2017
The writer is a US-based corporate attorney, author and analyst. He can be reached at Tausifkamal@hotmail.com

If you drive around our country, you are bound to come across some sights painful to the eyes: unfinished buildings, incomplete structures, abandoned roads, bridges, dams, power plants and projects of various types.

All such concrete manifestations of broken promises, breached agreements and dishonoured contracts litter our national landscape. The story of Pakistan is a story of these gaping and gashing economic and psychological wounds that have been self-inflicted on the nation by the abrupt cancellation of various project contracts, simultaneously accompanied by stoppage of work thereunder in mid stride. And none of these has had more of a devastating impact on the national economy and national reputation than contractual disputes involving international parties.

We have been witnessing a cascade of adverse arbitration decisions against Pakistan by international arbitration forums, such as ICSID, ICC, noted for their neutrality and expertise, in cases of international contracts that we entered into with foreign investors and entities. Jolted by the unpleasing reality of this fiasco, many of our fellow citizens are asking the inevitable question: why is Pakistan losing all the international arbitration cases? No mystery there, no rapacious capitalists lurking in the background, no international conspiracy against Pakistan.

We are losing because, in the eyes of neutral judges, our government and its agencies are not fulfilling their obligations or duties under these agreements or contracts and/or violating the relevant bilateral treaty that protects foreign investments. In other words, we are not honouring contracts we have agreed to and signed.

For instance, in the Reko Diq mining case the ICSID arbitrators ruled that our government was in breach of the joint venture contract and the pertinent bilateral investment treaty because it refused to grant TCC, the Argentina/Australia company, the required mining production lease.

In the IPP case filed by nine IPPs, all domestic, before the ICC arbitration tribunal in London, all the neutral arbitrators held our federal government violated its agreement as it was in default of its payment obligations to the IPPs.

To avoid huge setbacks in international arbitration, our government and its agencies must follow at least the following crucial caveats before executing any international or domestic contracts. First, the government functionaries must minutely read, fully comprehend and be agreeable to all our obligations in the proposed contract, realising that once it’s signed, all its terms and conditions will be enforceable with the force of law.

Second, they must pay close attention to the dispute resolution clauses. Understand the legally binding nature of arbitration and the exclusive jurisdiction of the selected arbitration forum that preempts jurisdiction of our Pakistani courts and laws in the event of a dispute.

Third, the government should be aware that failure to meet our obligations and duties on any pretext can have disastrous consequences and result in payment of billions of dollars in damages.

Fourth, not honouring international contracts tarnishes the country’s image as a trustworthy destination for sorely needed foreign capital and know-how, increases political risk coverage and the total cost of doing business in Pakistan. Abiding by contracts is also a moral and ethical matter. We must keep our word and honour.

Fifth, realise that collateral defence of fraud and corruption in the procurement of international contracts is very difficult to prove since it requires solid documentary proof.

Sixth, as we all know that any international contract or joint venture awarded in secrecy gives rise to suspicion of impropriety and corruption, it behooves the government to display transparency in the execution of contracts. Prime examples of such surreptitiously executed contracts are the Qatar LNG Gas Sales and other ancillary agreements.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 4th, 2017.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

COMMENTS (4)

KANISHKA | 7 years ago | Reply How about misinformation campaign by the establishment to force the government either not to understand the interpretation of treaties or keep filing suits in appropriate courts such as in the case of Indus Water Treaty to annoy other party?
Barrister Ahmed | 7 years ago | Reply Super write-up, must read by our lawyers and govt people..Thanks
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ