There followed a circular exercise in futility as question after question was referred elsewhere, dodged or simply not answered at all. Circumlocution was the order of the day, and answers denied on the thinnest of technicalities by those that might be expected to know the answers but were not going to have them wrung out in a public forum. Where answers were given they mainly contained information already long in the public domain and did nothing to further our understanding of how the terrorist/extremist nexus was being managed.
Whilst we accept that there are sound operational reasons why it is not prudent to disclose some details, we do not accept the laissez-faire attitude adopted by some provincial governments as to how they respond to banned organisations. There are examples of those holding extreme views attempting to gain footholds in mainstream politics, a move that if successful shifts the political fulcrum even further to the right. For banned outfits to gain acceptance politically makes nonsense of banning them in the first place. Most already operate openly anyway with blind eyes being turned by those in power who harbour a sympathy to them. There is a long-overdue job to do which is as important as ridding ourselves of banned organisations and that is ridding ourselves of the mindset(s) that allow them to flourish and prosper. A circular mutuality is ultimately cancerous, and the oxygen of tolerance only allows the tumour to grow.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 16th, 2017.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ