If former dictator General Musharraf was not brought to justice during Sharif’s four-year rule, who is to blame?
HAYATABAD, PESHAWAR: Crest-fallen and embittered, ousted prime minister Nawaz Sharif himself has resorted to the politics of containers — something he criticised during Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf’s chief Imran Khan’s dharna (sit-ins) in Islamabad in the not-so-distant past.
On his way home from Islamabad on August 10th, Nawaz Sharif spoke from behind a bullet-proof glass in his container to supporters in Jhelum. The theme of the deposed premier’s speech was his disqualification by the Supreme Court.
The Panama Papers verdict, to him, is an insult to the entire nation that had catapulted him into power for a record third time. He claimed transforming Pakistan into a modern and economically stable country, a hub of investments.
Sharif also touted his employment schemes, unprecedented energy initiatives and development. He repeatedly sought assurances from the audience to help him restore respect for the public mandate.
Let me say he offered jobs, but only to his blue-eyed boys. As for electricity, rural Pakistan is yet to come out of darkness. In this scorching summer, almost all Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa villages have been without electricity for weeks on end. Development remains lop-sided, driven by political expediency.
The Lion of Lahore did roar at the five judges who disqualified him with a single stroke of the pen, but did not give any money trail for his and his children’s blooming offshore businesses. To his mind, perjury is no offence.
If former dictator General Pervez Musharraf was not brought to justice during Sharif’s four-year rule, who is to blame? If he had tried General Musharraf, Nawaz Sharif would have become an immortal statesman. Lamentably, however, he stuck to the politics of expediency and deals.
M Afzal Khan
Published in The Express Tribune, August 15th, 2017.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
