Don't mess with me young man, Reham Khan tells Murad Saeed

PTI leader and TV presenter trade allegations


News Desk August 07, 2017
Reham Khan and Murad Saeed. PHOTO: File.

Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) leader MNA Murad Saeed and TV presenter Reham Khan became embroiled in a war of allegations when the former lashed out at her for trying to taint his party chief's image.

Saeed, in response to Reham's press conference a day earlier wherein she had denied allegations that she was behind MNA Ayesha Gulalai’s harassment allegations against PTI chief Imran Khan, said the TV presenter's motive behind her statement was meant to malign his party chairman.

On Reham saying that she was ready swear upon the Holy Quran that she had nothing to do with Gulalai, Saeed asked if she could she testify in the same manner as to who she had met at a five-star hotel in Islamabad.

I swear upon Holy Quran I've nothing to do with Ayesha Gulalai: Reham Khan

He also said Reham should disclose while swearing upon the Holy Quran who had provided her with a vehicle to visit Swat and what was the name of the political leader who was personally supporting her.

Reham took to Twitter to respond to Saeed's allegations, telling him that she could produce an invoice for the vehicle she had used to visit Swat.

"I am not the one with skeletons in the closet young man," she snapped back.

"This young man should know why he should not risk his political career by slinging mud at me," she tweeted.

"This young man should know that I can answer all his questions & others with evidence. The truth will hurt him."

Reham also she took a jab at Saeed's performance as a parliamentarian:



She posted one more tweet, but apparently this was meant for 'somebody else' instead of Saeed:



 

 

COMMENTS (9)

Ann | 7 years ago | Reply @Andrew Thank you
Billa | 7 years ago | Reply Murad Saeed is just another big mouth of PTI.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ