Reinventing a gender-fair curriculum

Published: June 23, 2017
SHARES
Email
The writer is a teaching fellow in the writing and communication stream, department of humanities and social sciences at the Lahore University of Management Sciences

The writer is a teaching fellow in the writing and communication stream, department of humanities and social sciences at the Lahore University of Management Sciences

Teaching a core language course at a university one comes across students from diverse educational backgrounds. It was not a revelation that the Intermediate students mostly stumbled in the subject as compared to their A-level counterparts. Not only are the Intermediate background students less proficient in language, but they are also guilty of holding stereotypical mindsets.

Out of sheer exasperation and determination to unearth the reasons for such a predicament, I searched the Punjab English Intermediate Textbook Board curriculum. As I scrolled down the contents of the four Intermediate English textbooks, I gasped with dismay! Though it had been more than two decades since I sat for my Intermediate English exam, the scenario of these crucial career deciding examinations and its curriculum had not altered.

The Punjab Intermediate Textbook Board has maintained the status quo and the curriculum has been guilty of propagating gender stereotypes. Once these gendered identities are instilled, they leave an indelible impression on the young minds of the students. Eventually, they become guilty of perpetuating and practising sexism or, even graver consequences, indulge in molestation of their female counterparts.

According to the Asian Human Rights Commission, each day 12 women suffer rape in Pakistan. Though these heinous crimes receive nationwide condemnation and endeavours have been made to unearth the main causes of these inhumane acts, one of its causes is the instilling of the patriarchal setup through our curriculum.

In order to validate the propagation of gender stereotyping through the English Intermediate curriculum, a research on the constructions of gender stereotypes was conducted by Malaysian researchers Jayakaran Mukundan and Vahid Nimechisalem. The research categorised stereotyping into various forms of sexism: invisibility: fewer females than males; occupational stereotyping: females in fewer and more menial occupational roles; relationship stereotyping: women more in relation with men than men with women; personal characteristics stereotyping: women portrayed as emotional and timid; dispowering discourse roles: more males talking first or voicing their opinions more than females; degrading and blatant sexism to the point of misogyny.

These categories were set as indicators of the corpus analysis in detecting the construction of gender identities and the results established that there is an absolute construction of gender typecasting through the four Intermediate English compulsory textbooks. The language employed in the textbooks has been instrumental in propagating the stereotypes by marginalising the females and uplifting the male counterparts. Females are mostly invisible in the text and the limited number of appearances has been stereotyped in typical roles of housewives, mostly engaged in childrearing or seeking approval of their male family members. Females have been portrayed in sub-ordinated roles and have been deprived of the right to decide for themselves, depicting blatant sexism and hegemonic masculinity.

There is a dire need to break free of the masculinity and femininity predetermined by the male hegemony. This could be established through deconstruction of these gender stereotypical images and roles by redefining them. The corpus analysed painted a picture in which females were underrepresented, marginalised and invisible, whereas male heroes and icons were predominantly selected. This kind of discrimination only depicts that female icons are not worthy enough to be a part of the corpus.

Gender deconstruction will not only be inspirational for young female learners, but it will also be instrumental in shaping the outlook of the male counterparts towards them. Hence, female national icons like Benazir Bhutto, Fatima Jinnah, Rana Liaquat Ali Khan, Nida Tariq or Samina Baig could be included in the syllabus. International female figures such as Mother Teresa, Margaret Thatcher or Sheikh Hasina Wajid could become excellent content for reading.

Published in The Express Tribune, June 23rd, 2017.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (1)

  • Toti Calling
    Jun 23, 2017 - 12:52PM

    I fully support the sentiments. Any society which dos not treat women as equal partners in life will always remain a backward society. Women need to get a quota for all jobs, the freedom to walk freely and choose their own friends and partners and should get equal share of all assets from parents and husbands. I know many educated people with top jobs who treat their wives badly, shouting at them in presence of others and all women are supposed to say is: Yes sir. That attitude needs overhaul. Recommend

Leave Your Reply Below

Your comments may appear in The Express Tribune paper. For this reason we encourage you to provide your city. The Express Tribune does not bear any responsibility for user comments.

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

More in Opinion