SHC issues notices on plea against crackdown on social media activists

Petitioners want court to declare that criticism of armed forces did not amount to a criminal offence


Our Correspondent June 08, 2017
Sindh High Court. PHOTO: EXPRESS

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) issued on Wednesday notices to the interior ministry and Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) director-general to file comments on civil society members' petition against the crackdown on social media activists for allegedly criticising the armed forces online.

A two-judge bench, headed by Justice Syed Hasan Azhar Rizvi, also issued a notice to the deputy attorney general to file comments of the relevant authorities by June 15.

A group of the human rights and social media activists, journalists and others, including Farieha Aziz, Zohra Yousuf, Ghazi Salahuddin and Jibran Nasir, had approached the court, challenging the arrests and detentions of online critics in a fresh crackdown by the FIA.

Shah Mehmood meets detained social media activists at FIA office

Naming Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan and the FIA director-general as respondents, the petitioners said Khan ordered the FIA in mid-May to initiate action against persons running 'anti-military' campaigns on the internet.

They said minister claimed to have taken notice of the online criticism against the armed forces, following the announcement of the military's media affairs wing of the withdrawal of a tweet published by the Inter-Services Public Relations, rejecting the inquiry report issued by the prime minister's office regarding a news report published by Dawn newspaper in January, 2017 on the alleged differences between the government and armed forces regarding counter-terrorism strategies.

Since then, the petitioner said the FIA had detained dozens of people involved in what it calls 'an organised campaign' against the country's armed forces on social media. They added that according to their information, no FIR had been registered against most of the individuals who were detained in the crackdown, nor has the FIA disclosed their identities.

Cyber crime: 'PTI social media activist in FIA custody'

They cited the case of activist Adnan Afzal Qureshi, who was arrested from Lahore on May 31 and charged him under Section 20 and 24 of the Pakistan Electronic Crimes Act and Section 419 and Section 500 of the Pakistan Penal Code. The FIA claimed that the activist was arrested for anti-military tweets and abusive language against military personnel and political leaders.

The judges were told that the FIA had also sent inquiry notices to a number of political and social activists, directing them to appear at the FIA's Counter-Terrorism Wing police station by a specified time and date. The court was informed that the FIA had also seized laptops, phones and other electronic devices owned by the detained individuals, without any lawful authority or court warrant in sheer violation of the law.

The petitioners' lawyer, Barrister Salahuddin Ahmed, argued that this arrest was an example and sign of how the respondents intended to misuse the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, 2015, (PECA) to quell freedom of speech. The lawyer added that the Section 20 of PECA pertained to offense against dignity of a natural person, while the Section 24 of PECA pertained to cyber stalking.

Cyber crime: Social media activist released amid PTI’s hue and cry

PECA does not prohibit criticism of the armed forces, therefore, it provided no basis for the arrest whatsoever, he said, adding that the alleged criticism of the armed forces could form the basis of charges under Section 419 (punishment for cheating by personation) and Section 500 (defamation) of the Pakistan Penal Code.

The court was pleaded to declare that criticism of the armed forces did not, by itself, amount to a criminal offence and could not be subjected to any coercive action by the state. They also pleaded to restrain the interior ministry and FIA authorities from carrying on investigation, inquiry and taking or threatening any coercive action against any persons, including arrest, detention or seizure of property, merely on the basis of having criticised the armed forces.

A request was also made to direct them to produce a list of the all persons arrested in connection with the crackdown, if any.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ