With Thar coal project, Pakistan is harnessing the dirtiest energy

Published: April 13, 2017
Vast coal deposits may appear tempting but they must remain underground for the earth to survive. PHOTO: FILE

Vast coal deposits may appear tempting but they must remain underground for the earth to survive. PHOTO: FILE

Vast coal deposits may appear tempting but they must remain underground for the earth to survive. PHOTO: FILE

Leaders from around the world had gathered in Paris to sign a landmark agreement on climate change in late 2015. On the occasion, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif told his fellow heads of states that Pakistan was committed to the cause of reducing global emissions, which are heating up the planet and triggering changes in the climate. Though Pakistan itself has never been a major contributor to global warming, the country is among the ten most vulnerable states to climate change, with erratic weather events becoming a common occurrence and related losses running into billions of dollars.

“Several mitigation initiatives, including promotion of affordable renewable technologies, measures towards energy efficiency, implementation of mass transport systems and expansion of hydroelectricity potential, are already part of our development strategy,” PM Nawaz had told the world at the time.

What he conveniently decided not to mention was his country’s interest in tapping into its vast coal reserves to address the national energy crisis; to use a fossil fuel which is labelled the world’s single greatest climate threat.


Dumpers working at a mining site in the Thar Desert. PHOTO: SECMC

Why is coal bad?

Coal is a rock formed when dead plants and animals decompose and solidify underground over the years. The fossil fuel acquired significance in the global arena during the Industrial Revolution when it was used to power steam engines and produce electricity. By 2013, it was providing over 40 per cent of the world’s electricity needs.

However, burning coal releases carbon dioxide – a vital yet heat-trapping gas – into the atmosphere and makes the planet warmer than ‘normal’. In 2016, the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide crossed the dangerous 400 parts-per-million threshold and scientists warned that increased use of coal is driving the planet towards a serious climate catastrophe, which will be irreversible.

In this backdrop, there is an overwhelming consensus in the scientific and political communities of the world that coal must remain in the ground and countries should instead focus on investing in renewable energy sources such as solar and wind. However, Pakistan’s plans to mine and burn coal on a massive level are ringing alarm bells far and wide.

Thar coal project

The coal reserves in Pakistan’s Thar Desert spread over more than 9,000 sq/km of land and are estimated to be 175 billion tonnes in quantity. Believed to be one of the largest coal deposits in the world, Thar’s reserves are believed to be equivalent to the total oil reserves of Saudi Arabia and Iran (in terms of heating value) and can produce 100,000MW of electricity for three centuries.


The mining site has to be dug up in order to reach the deposits of coal. PHOTO: SECMC

To tap into this vast unexploited resource, the government has allowed Sindh Engro Coal Mining Company (SECMC) to utilise one per cent of the total coal reserves as part of the many power projects taking place under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor scheme. With the 1.57 billion tonnes of coal that lie underground, the company aims to produce 660MW electricity by June 2019, 1,320MW by December 2019 and 3,300MW by 2022.

Work on the Thar coal project has begun, but SECMC is facing criticism as there are concerns regarding land rights of the people of Thar, groundwater depletion, and environmental deterioration.


Dumpers transporting the excavated material from the mining site. PHOTO: SECMC

In order to begin coal extraction, SECMC has started to dry the mine by extracting water from the area. The extracted water has no toxic or heavy metals, but it is still not safe for drinking. The water will be transferred and stored in a large reservoir which spreads across 1,500 acres. Locals from Gorrano village, which is located right next to the reservoir, have their reservations as they have lost space for livestock grazing due to the construction of the reservoir and fear seepage from it will pollute groundwater which they are dependent on.

The pipeline which brings polluted water from the mine to the reservoir

The pipeline which brings extracted water from the mine site to the reservoir. PHOTO: SECMC

Pehlaj, a 40-year-old father of seven from Gorrano, is among the many Tharis who have been staging a sit-in outside the Islamkot Press Club for several months. Speaking to The Express Tribune, Pehlaj said Gorrano is among 12 villages which will likely be affected by the reservoir. “The government has not yet compensated everyone on whose land the reservoir is built. We will not end the protest unless the reservoir is moved,” he said, adding that approximately 18,000 would be affected at its current location.

Women also join the protest at Islamkot Press Club urging government to stop work on the construction of the reservoir

Men and women come together to protest outside Islamkot Press Club, urging the government to stop construction of the reservoir. PHOTO: ZOFEEN T EBRAHIM

SECMC, however, dismisses the claim and said there are only three villages settled outside the reservoir area with a total population of approximately 3,000, and that none of them will be relocated. The matter of land acquisition and compensation is being dealt under the Land Acquisition Act 1894 and by the Sindh Revenue Department, a spokesperson explained.

Other Engro officials said 968 out of 1,500 acres belong to the government and only 532 acres are privately owned. The government, they said, has so far paid Rs300,000 per acre to the legal owners of 268 acres.


Construction work underway at the mining site. PHOTO: SECMC

There is, however, a plan to relocate 171 families from Senhri Dars village, situated at the mining site. In addition to compensating them for their land, the families will also be provided with model houses worth Rs3 million each. The new settlement where the village will be shifted is four kilometres away from their current residential area.

SECMC, in order to reduce the impact of air pollution for the residents, has decided to build 180-metre tall chimneys, which the company claims will be the tallest civil structure in Pakistan. Regarding the concerns that China may be transferring outdated coal technology as part of these power plant project, SECMC CEO Shamsuddin Sheikh said state-of-the-art machinery is being imported, including European boilers.



One of the chimneys which will release hot gas into the atmosphere. PHOTO: SECMC

Answer to Pakistan’s energy crisis

It is strange that China itself is shunning coal as a source of energy but is encouraging Pakistan to use it to address the energy crisis.

The Asian giant is the world’s top carbon polluter but has reduced its reliance on coal in the last decade and has been shifting towards renewable energy. It has shut down its last large coal power plant in Beijing and has also announced a plan to cancel 100 more in other parts of the country. The national government has also invested US$361 billion in the renewable power generation sector which will not just shift the country to clean energy but will create 13 million jobs as well. As a result of these measures, in 2015, China’s carbon emissions declined for the first time in the last 15 years.

Areil Mine View

Aerial view of the mining site. PHOTO: SECMC

While Thar coal reserves may appear tempting to Pakistan in the face of a relentless power crisis, they are not the only way the country can address the issue.

Dr Adil Najam, a renowned educationist and lead author of IPCC’s third and fifth assessment reports, rightly says the great transition in energy is already happening. “Coal is out. Solar and wind are in. Renewables can now be produced at megawatt-scale and they are now at or near cost-competitive levels,” he says.

“The idea that Pakistan has no alternatives to coal as an energy source is simply wrong. But also wrong is the idea that there has to be a single alternative to coal. The energy economy of the future will be a multi-sourced economy. What that means is that coal is not going to be ‘replaced’ by wind, solar, geothermal, ocean wave or any other singular ‘magic’ technology. It is going to be replaced by a combination of all these technologies and by many others,” he further explained.

According to Najam, none of the many alternative energy sources that are available can ‘alone’ replace coal. “But together, they have the potential to meet Pakistan’s needs. However, this will require thinking not in terms of energy ‘projects’ but in terms of energy ‘policy’ and even energy ‘strategy’,” Najam stressed.

Syed Muhammad Abubakar is an international award-winning environmental writer with an interest in climate change, deforestation, food security and sustainable development. He tweets @SyedMAbubakar and can be reached at s.m.abubakar@hotmail.com

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (10)

  • Anon
    Apr 13, 2017 - 8:35PM

    Coal has by far the lowest share in our total energy production and among the lowest in the world. Our contribution to global warming is also negligible. Coal is absolutely essential to meet our energy needs in the short to medium term at cheap and affordable costs. There is no alternative to coal in the short term other than lnatural gas and oil which are both more expensive Recommend

  • Aware Citizen
    Apr 14, 2017 - 12:11AM

    America produces its 25 % energy need from coal. When poorer countries do the same so called funded environment protectionists start gaming.Recommend

  • muhammad saif ur rehman
    Apr 14, 2017 - 3:19AM

    poor peoples energy source is coal

  • Shakil
    Apr 14, 2017 - 3:43AM

    Pakistan need to generate energy from its local resources to make it cheaper. Pakistan used to generate most from renewable source Water, at present its most from expensive furnace oil!

    While Pakistan need to diversify its energy generation, its prime target should be to generate more and cheap energy to at least finish load shedding. While coal is not so good, renewable like solar, wind cant meet Pakistan needs quickly and it is one of the expensive one too.Recommend

  • Farrukh Mian
    Apr 14, 2017 - 7:35AM

    Pakistan has failed to harness its waters as large-reservoir-based hydropower projects were not built on time. The same story should not be repeated in the case of domestic coal which should be put to use for meeting the country’s energy needs. Development of Thar Coal is the step in right direction and within a decade this coal-field will become the centre-piece of Pakistan’s energy value-chain. Recommend

  • shaikh
    Apr 14, 2017 - 8:55AM

    I think the author has a biased view regarding environmental policies. Pakistan’s contribution to global warming is negligible, even if we produce electricity from coal, still, the very very minor effect will be on the environment. Now we are conventional generators everywhere in small and big cities and we use batteries to store energy. These are also dangerous to the environment. So what’s the point author want to explain? The US and other big countries have destroyed the environment since decades. Even in a current scenario, the electricity consumption of California state is greater than Pakistan.Recommend

  • FAZ
    Apr 14, 2017 - 11:12AM

    The author conveniently forgets that all developed countries including China built their industrial empire from coal. Just because you live in the modern age, doesnt make you modern. You got to afford those gadgets. Wind is getting expensive. Solar is getting cheaper especially at residential and small commercial scale. Government should encourage solar energy for homes and industries so that reliance on coal could be limitedRecommend

  • Syed Muhammad Abubakar
    Apr 14, 2017 - 12:24PM

    Dear All,

    Thanks for the response however I would like to inform that given the impacts coal is leading to being the principal driver of climate change it should be kept in the ground. Renewable energy is now highly competitive and there are many energy options which Pakistan can explore. Climate science is clear that we have to abstain from coal to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees.

    Also Pakistan is a signatory to global agreements according to which it cannot invest in coal which is a violation of the treaties. Even though Pakistan’s emissions are negligible that doesnt mean it should venture into this dirtiest fossil fuel which is the principal driver of climate change.

    Even China has moved away from coal then why are we venturing into it now?? This will not solve the problem, it will add to it.Recommend

  • Farrukh Mian
    Apr 14, 2017 - 2:49PM

    @ Syed Abu bakar. Renewables (solar and wind) are good, but in any power system there should be a mix of different technologies including thermal, hydro and renwables. Within thermal, we have nearly ZERO coal based generation, therefore, it’s perfectly acceptable to add coal-based power plants. Regarding climate change concerns, the amount of megawatts that Pakistan is adding is insignificant compared to world production.Recommend

  • Darjat
    Apr 15, 2017 - 11:32PM

    A GB government database shows under small hydro power head there are 75 sites with cumulative potential of 1127 MW. And 17 Mega project potential sites, have capacity of generating 24,865 MW. Go for clean ENERGY Recommend

More in Pakistan