Some Pakistani power firms stuck in slow lane on China's Silk Road

'We have to make sure (CPEC) doesn't become a Trojan Horse and start hurting existing industry'


Reuters March 30, 2017
Fahd Chinoy, general manager sales & marketing of Pakistan Cables, poses during an interview with Reuters at plant in Karachi, Pakistan, March 22, 2017. Picture taken March 22, 2017. PHOTO: REUTERS

KARACHI/LAHORE, PAKISTAN: Kamal Amjad Mian thought China's decision to invest $36 billion in the Pakistani power sector would benefit his electricity cable business, and, anticipating increased demand, his family spent nearly $30 million on a second plant to double output.

 Kamal Amjad Mian, Director of Fast Cables, poses for a picture at plant in Lahore, Pakistan, March 24, 2017. PHOTO: REUTERS Kamal Amjad Mian, Director of Fast Cables, poses for a picture at plant in Lahore, Pakistan, March 24, 2017. PHOTO: REUTERS

But Mian's Fast Cables and some other Pakistani manufacturers have yet to reap rewards from Beijing's huge "One Belt, One Road" (OBOR) project, a modern-day "Silk Road" network of trade routes across land and sea.

Beijing interested in Pakistan's development, not profits: Chinese power boss

Power stations built as part of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a $57 billion project involving energy, road and rail infrastructure, are being kitted out with Chinese cables exempt from import duty and sales tax. Such exemptions, more generous for CPEC projects than others, threaten to undermine local industry, according to Mian, one of a growing number of executives now questioning an initiative long portrayed as the key to Pakistan's prosperity.

 A worker operates crane at copper wire unit at Pakistan Cables in Karachi, Pakistan March 22, 2017. PHOTO: AFP A worker operates crane at copper wire unit at Pakistan Cables in Karachi, Pakistan March 22, 2017. PHOTO: REUTERS

"The government, instead of giving us a level playing field, gave them an advantage," Mian said in Lahore.

A Water and Power Ministry official, who declined to be named because he was not authorised to speak to the media, said "there were question marks about whether the local cable industry could fulfill the demands under CPEC and we worried it would slow down projects."

Chinese envoy says CPEC has created 13,000 jobs

Beijing's CPEC splurge and a drop in militant violence have reinvigorated Pakistan's sluggish economy, driving growth to about 5 per cent for the first time since 2008. The public and political parties broadly support Chinese investment, while cement and steel companies who bagged early CPEC contracts are embarking on aggressive expansion. Executives also say Chinese investors are poised for an acquisitions spree in Pakistan.

 A worker monitors automatic copper wire unit at the Fast Cables plant in Lahore, Pakistan, March 24, 2017. PHOTO: REUTERS A worker monitors automatic copper wire unit at the Fast Cables plant in Lahore, Pakistan, March 24, 2017. PHOTO: REUTERS

Trojan horse or saviour?

But not everyone is happy. Critics say CPEC projects are opaque and expensive, and question Pakistan's ability to repay the costs over time.

Some firms fear they will struggle to compete with Chinese companies with deeper pockets, economies of scale and vastly cheaper credit lines.

"We have to make sure (CPEC) doesn't become a Trojan Horse and start hurting existing industry," said Ehsan Malik, chief executive of the Pakistan Business Council.

CPEC beneficial for all of Pakistan: Chinese envoy

There is plenty still up for grabs for local players. The next phase of CPEC involves the creation of Special Economic Zones where Chinese state-run enterprises would open factories and help develop Pakistan's industrial base.

But Fast Cables' Mian said that, while domestic producers have been benefiting from broad economic growth, he fears his business will end up "dying a slow and painful death" if Chinese rivals setting up in Pakistan receive preferential tax breaks.

 A worker monitors automatic copper wire unit at the Fast Cables plant in Lahore, Pakistan, March 24, 2017. PHOTO: REUTERS A worker monitors automatic copper wire unit at the Fast Cables plant in Lahore, Pakistan, March 24, 2017. PHOTO: REUTERS

Mian and other cables makers are reviving a defunct industry association in order to lobby Islamabad, amid concerns Beijing will use its leverage over Pakistan to obtain those sweeteners.

"Very soon, if we are not nimble enough to recognise the issues, we could be in trouble," said Fahd Chinoy, whose family runs Pakistan Cables.

China, for which CPEC is a key part of its Silk Road ambitions, sought to assuage such fears.

‘CPEC a regional opportunity’

"The dividend, the well-being delivered by the corridor will benefit the people of both China and Pakistan, as well as of the region," Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying told a regular briefing, when asked about concerns in Pakistan.

The government in Islamabad was also keen to reassure domestic producers. "We are not (so foolish) as to not protect our local industry," said Miftah Ismail, a state minister charged with setting up CPEC Special Economic Zones.

"I want to assure people we will never give greater protection to our Chinese investing friends," Ismail added. "It will never be an uneven playing field."

The Pakistani government, citing local worries about being crowded out, said in January it would prioritise domestic companies over Chinese ones in the forthcoming sell-off of state-run companies.

 Fahd Chinoy, general manager sales & marketing of Pakistan Cables, poses during an interview with Reuters at office building in Karachi, Pakistan, March 22, 2017. PHOTO: REUTERS Fahd Chinoy, general manager sales & marketing of Pakistan Cables, poses during an interview with Reuters at office building in Karachi, Pakistan, March 22, 2017. PHOTO: REUTERS

Winners and losers?

Pakistan's struggling textiles sector, which account for 60 per cent of the country's exports, is watching nervously.

CPEC: the goose with the golden eggs

China is offering vast incentives and ploughing billions of dollars into the Western region of Xinjiang to build a textile industry, which will rely on CPEC road and rail links to export goods via Pakistan's Arabian sea port of Gwadar.

The Karachi Chamber of Commerce & Industry and other organisations worry that Pakistan will become a dumping ground for Chinese goods once the Xinjiang-Gwadar transit route becomes operational and traffic volumes soar.

"If those products end up on the domestic market without duties, it will devastate the local industry," said Aamir Fayyaz, chairman of the All Pakistan Textile Mills Association (APTMA).

Wang Zihai, president of the Pakistan-China Joint Chamber of Commerce and Industry, compared Pakistan to China three decades ago, when its nascent industries faced competition from more advanced Japanese and American companies.

 A worker monitors automatic copper wire unit at Pakistan Cables in Karachi, Pakistan March 22, 2017. PHOTO: REUTERS A worker monitors automatic copper wire unit at Pakistan Cables in Karachi, Pakistan March 22, 2017. PHOTO: REUTERS

"Chinese companies did not die," Wang said. "Chinese are not here to take over everything, they want partners. They need a local party to work together."

And for early CPEC winners, optimism abounds.

Hussain Agha's family-run steel business has bagged several CPEC contracts and is planning an initial public offering (IPO) to raise cash to expand. "Those who are geared for the economic renaissance of Pakistan will thrive, and those who are not will miss the bus," said Agha, an executive director at Agha Steel Industries.

"We are getting ready for the 'Roaring 20s'."

COMMENTS (2)

Varun | 7 years ago | Reply A cable business spent $30 million for an upgrade? Seriously?
salman | 7 years ago | Reply Why Pakistani firms are afraid from the competition. P.S it will take further 2-3 years for CPEC projects to be implemented completely so one should not expect profits straight away.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ