Government urged not to execute schizophrenic convict

Extremely concerned’ by plans to execute 55-year-old Khizar Hayat, says World Psychiatric Association

Afp January 27, 2017

ISLAMABAD: An international group of psychiatrists called on the government Friday not to execute a prisoner suffering from schizophrenia, days before his temporary stay of execution is set to expire.

Lawyers and rights groups say convicted murderer Khizar Hayat, 55, cannot be executed as he cannot understand his crime and punishment. The World Psychiatric Association said it was "extremely concerned" by the plans to execute Hayat, warning his death would be "an irreversible miscarriage of justice".

"After eight years of treatment with powerful anti-psychotic medications, his symptoms remain as serious as ever, leading to a diagnosis that his schizophrenia is treatment resistant," said the statement by the association.

LHC stays execution of mentally ill man

Hayat, a former police officer, was sentenced to death in 2003 for shooting a colleague. He was diagnosed as suffering from paranoid schizophrenia in 2008. His execution had been set for January 17, but Lahore High Court intervened days before he was set to face the gallows, giving him a temporary stay until January 30.

The court ruled it would be "unjust" to proceed on Hayat's case without waiting for the Supreme Court's decision in the case of Imdad Ali, another schizophrenic facing execution. Ali was given a last-minute reprieve in October. The LHC judges will rule Monday if Hayat's stay of execution should be extended until the apex court determines Ali's fate.

The United Nations has previously called on Pakistan to protect mentally ill inmates, singling out Hayat as having "psychosocial disabilities". Since lifting its moratorium on executions in December 2014, the country has hanged some 420 prisoners, overtaking Saudi Arabia to become the world's third largest executioner nation after China and Iran.

Facebook Conversations


waqar | 3 years ago | Reply | Recommend Question arise Was he mentally unwell when he carried out the crime? If he was all good when he committed then crime but developed this mental illness later on then he shouldnt be pardoned.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ

Load Next Story