Petition ‘premature’: Plea to make US govt party to Davis case rejected

LHC chief justice says Pakistani courts lack jurisdiction to implead the US government.

Express March 08, 2011


Pakistani courts do not have the jurisdiction to implead the US government, through their ambassador to Pakistan, as a party in the case against Raymond Davis, said Lahore High Court Chief Justice Ijaz Ahmad Chaudhry on Monday.

The CJ was hearing a petition filed by Advocate Muhammad Azhar Siddique, requesting the inclusion of the US government as a necessary party in the case against Davis.

Hearing the petition, which also challenged America’s possible move to take up the matter to the International Court of Justice, Chaudhry said America would not accept the writ of Pakistani courts and therefore, there is no point impleading the US.

Whether Davis enjoys diplomatic immunity has to be answered by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the chief justice said, adding the petition is premature since the involvement of US government would be determined after the foreign ministry takes a stand on the issue of immunity.

The petitioner submitted that efforts to take Davis’ case to the ICJ would amount to circumventing the jurisdiction of this court and facilitate the release of the accused.

He added that Pakistani courts do not have an embargo on their jurisdiction to look into the matter, even if the accused is granted diplomatic immunity. The petitioner referred to the Act of 1972 whereby the government’s decision to grant diplomatic immunity to the accused has been held conclusive and said this act, and the relevant provision, hit against the fundamental right  guaranteed by the Constitution to its citizens.

The petitioner also maintained it would not hurt the case if the US government’s viewpoint is also taken into consideration before passing a verdict in this case.

Justice Chaudhry, however, termed fears of the petitioner unfounded at this stage and refused to entertain them.

Meanwhile, Imran Haider, brother of one the deceased in Davis’ case Faizan Haider, filed a petition before the LHC, requesting to be made a necessary party in the case regarding Davis’ immunity.

Being the complainant in the murder case against Davis, Haider maintained he must be allowed to contest the immunity of the accused as well.

Published in The Express Tribune, March 8th, 2011.


Basit | 10 years ago | Reply @John: John, I want to ask you whether you are a technical guy or not? If you are related to any technology, then you must know that even copying some circuit diagram can not make you to work for you. Com'on, be realistic. You can imagine that how many hurdles and challenges you have to face for a process or project on which you havnt worked but just saw it working. To make things work by your own is the biggest achievement and Dr A Q was able to be part of that. secondly, remember that it was Americans who took German scientists with them to make it for them... right?
Hamid Siddiqui | 10 years ago | Reply @John: Just a correction in your sentence "A.q.Khan stole the plans from Danish facility" In a civilized world where we are becoming slaves of technologies, it should be rephrased as A.Q Khan aquired the technology from that part of the world and this is a right of every country in the world, as did the other countries of this world. Nuclear is not some thing that was born in a country, and has a nationality, it is as other technologies very democtratic, from the people and for the people. A.Q.Khan is very courageous hero and son of Pakistan, who paid back to his country a little from what he earned by being a Pakistani. We are proud of him and many like him who have worked to bring this technology in use, better than many countries have.
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ


Most Read