CPEC and Russia’s quest for warm water ports

Published: December 13, 2016
SHARES
Email

Pakistan’s point-man for China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), Ahsan Iqbal, just concluded an exhaustive visit to Moscow. What would have been the point of a sojourn if there was no talk about the corridor and access to the warm waters of the Arabian Sea? A fortnight ago, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif attended the Global Conference on Sustainable Transport in Ashgabat, Turkmenistan. Islamabad not only offered its land route to landlocked Central Asian states but also extended the olive branch to Russia. Moscow tried a different strategy to reach the warm waters of the Arabian Sea for three decades, but spectacularly failed courtesy the Afghans and Pakistan.

Russian foreign ministry denied any negotiations with Pakistan on joining the China-sponsored corridor to the Arabian Sea via the Gwadar port. The federal minister’s visit 10 days later offered a blunt rejoinder. On its part, the Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation member state showed its willingness to work with Russia, thus the meeting with Maksim Sokolov, the Russian transport minister.

Turbulent ties

Islamabad and Moscow first interacted on the fringes of the UN General Assembly meeting on May 1, 1948, when Foreign Minister Sir Zafarullah Khan met his counterpart. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto aspired to create a better bargain for Pakistan by wooing Russia, when he first visited the country in 1960 as Minister of Fuel Power and Natural Resources. Later, he remained actively engaged with Moscow as a foreign minister as well. The engagement eventually led to post-1965 war Tashkent Declaration. Kremlin backed Delhi outrightly as it sponsored Bengali secessionist militancy in 1971. Despite this, the controversial populist leader visited Moscow in 1972 as premier. Later, Russia launched a proxy war against Pakistan after it sided with the Afghan resistance against its military intervention as well as the capitalist bloc.

Moscow not mulling to join CPEC: Russian foreign ministry

Following his father’s footstep, Premier Benazir Bhutto tried to warm relations with Russia in 1994-1995. However, political infighting at home and Moscow’s annoyance over the rise of Taliban factored in adversely. Just months prior to the coup, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif visited Russia in 1999. But General Musharraf pressed reset on almost everything the Nawaz government was pursuing, and ties with Russia were no exception.

Since Musharraf’s Russia visit in 2003, relations have steadily improved without considerable turbulence. While almost every Pakistan president or premier has visited Moscow since, none were reciprocated at the same level.

In 2015, commandoes from both sides held war-games, while their navies conducted a joint exercise in the northern Arabian Sea. These increasing comfort levels are leading the two nations to previously unchartered waters, the most notable being the sale of MiG-29’s engines, RD-33, for en masse production and likely export of JF-17 Thunder.

The move was preceded by a deal to buy Russian Mil Mi-35 gunships and electronic warfare equipment. Besides inducting initial deliveries of four rotary-wing aircrafts, Islamabad may order another 16 subject to the platform’s performance and budgetary conditions.

Partnership for mutual benefit

Russia’s prime interest in Pakistan has been investment in the energy sector, symbolised by financing of the 850km North-South (Lahore-Karachi) pipeline to securing investment in the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline. And it remains to be seen if Moscow agrees to invest in the Thar coal field.

If the overview of complicated bilateral relations can be any guide, both the countries are steadily developing ties but are still far from becoming strategic and economic partners. Russia’s defense cooperation with India is at a far advanced level, which for now remains un-deterred by Delhi’s advances to Washington.

CPEC’s western route: Protests may erupt over unkept promises

Of late, Moscow has not shared India’s hardened position against Pakistan, may it be the BRICS summit in Goa or Heart of Asia conference in Amritsar. Islamabad’s recent abstention on the UN resolution regarding Syria was also an effort to stay out of the Pandora’s box.

The offer to join CPEC is too enticing for Russia to out-rightly reject. Its energy projects, such as the pipeline network, may eventually culminate in Russian oil being shipped to the east and the west from Gwadar port. Even if Kremlin may not benefit from the CPEC in the short term, it won’t back India’s rhetoric against the logistical corridor.

Naveed Ahmad is a Pakistani investigative journalist and academic with extensive reporting experience in the Middle East and North Africa. He is based in Doha and Istanbul. He tweets @naveed360

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (10)

  • Asif
    Dec 13, 2016 - 5:47PM

    The Pakistani leadership needs to wake up from its deep sleep of ignorance. Warm water ….. what!? Warm water access was a thing of the past like in 50’s and 60’s. Technology has provided a solution as such for example Finland, Norway and Sweden has ships that can not only break the ice but can go straight through North Pole but do not proceed so as not to disturb the eco system. CPEC is not agate changer.Recommend

  • Honest Observer
    Dec 13, 2016 - 7:13PM

    Certain comments are totally idiotic. For those taking of ‘warm waters’ in literal meaning, it’s time to zoom out and see what it means for Russia. Kremlin’s borders on the one hand touch Japan and Sweden on the other with a protectorate within EU. The only deficiency in its geography is no outreach to mainland Asia, particularly near the Arabian Gulf. Sometime. one should not comment after just reading the headline.Recommend

  • hamza khan
    Dec 14, 2016 - 12:13AM

    @Asif:
    read a book. Recommend

  • Virkaul
    Dec 14, 2016 - 8:14AM

    Asif is right. “Warm Waters” is a thing of the past when Soviet Union existed and all CIS states were part of it. Russia has access to sea through Black Sea and the Suez. Land routes to Arabian sea involves crossing many countries from Moscow.

    Bottom line is without Afghanistan, Pakistan has no land connectivity to CIS. Connectivity cannot be held in isolation. Entire region needs to be connected from Thailand to Myanmar to
    India to Pakistan and Afghanistan. If Pakistan does not understand this all meetings and debates can turn futile.Recommend

  • FAZ
    Dec 14, 2016 - 8:34AM

    @Asif:
    Is defying laws of thermodynamics a common thing here. First there was a guy claiming to run a car on water and now you just equated a normal ship running on a normal engine to an ice breaker consuming twice or more fuel not to mention the other operating costs and cost of production etc of such a ship.Recommend

  • Asif
    Dec 14, 2016 - 11:55AM

    @hamza khan: Sir ji forget about what I wrote it is worse … Putin has denied any interest in CPEC. Nawaz is taking your brain on a spin. Recommend

  • Asif
    Dec 14, 2016 - 12:02PM

    @FAZ:
    I was making a point. That seeking warm water was thing of the past. Today shipping by ocean rather than rail is far cheaper and free trade throughout the globe is driven by cheaper products at your door step. So my numbers and economists I met on sideline in a recent CPEC trade-show in Pak-China Convention Centre, Islamabad and that they even have problem reconciling Government narrative of “game changer”. Recommend

  • Asif
    Dec 14, 2016 - 2:02PM

    @Honest Observer: Yes we are all idiots except yourself. Exactly, what large economy exists South of Arabian Sea …. duh Antartica? Africa is mostly mineral source backyard for Russia and that route has been around for decades but do you think Russian will forget what happened to them in Afghanistan and the role Pakistan played?
    Moreover, cost per ton to move is way cheaper by Ship than by Railroad hands down. Recommend

  • Adil
    Dec 14, 2016 - 2:15PM

    @Asif: Honest Observer is likely the salesman who supplies refrigerators to Antartica just like he wants supply energy to energy rich MiddleEast. India will never risk gas or petroleum pipeline through Pakistan and Afghanistan. Just too high of a risk. Recommend

  • Tariq
    Dec 16, 2016 - 1:51PM

    If Russian can give to Pakistan package like China give then Pakistan can give to Russian K T bander port exclusively for central Asia and Russia.Recommend

More in Pakistan

-->