Gillespie backs Starc-Hazlewood to become Australia’s finest-ever

Former pacer believes duo can surpass country’s previous great fast-bowling acts


Reuters December 02, 2016
Mitchell Starc. PHOTO: REUTERS

SYDNEY: Former Test star Jason Gillespie believes pace spearheads Mitchell Starc and Josh Hazlewood will become the greatest fast-bowling combination Australia has ever produced.

Gillespie, touted as a potential successor to current Test coach Darren Lehmann, said their performance in the recent series defeat to South Africa was a rare bright spot.

They finished as the first and third-highest wicket takers with Hazlewood grabbing 17 at an average of 22 and Starc 14 wickets at 30.

The duo have now played 17 Tests together since Hazlewood’s debut two years ago and have taken 161 wickets alongside each other.

Four-star Starc leaves South Africa reeling

“Starc and Hazlewood, without doubt, will be the best fast-bowling combination Australia has ever produced,” Gillespie, also seen as a possible replacement for Rod Marsh as chairman of selectors, told cricket.com.au yesterday. “They’ll stay fit, they’ll stay healthy, they’re learning their trade all the time, they complement each other very well.”

For his prediction to come true, they will have to surpass some of the greats of the game, including Gillespie who teamed up with Glenn McGrath to take 484 wickets between them in 58 Tests across a 10-year period.

Australia's Glenn Maxwell set to show prowess in New Zealand ODI series

“In many years’ time when we’re reflecting on great Australian cricketers, those two [Starc and Hazlewood] will be right up there,” said Gillespie, now back in Australia after a hugely successful five-year spell coaching English county Yorkshire.

Published in The Express Tribune, December 2nd, 2016.

Like Sports on Facebook, follow @ETribuneSports on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.

COMMENTS

Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ