De Kooning painting sold for record $66.3 million

The imposing work, which measures 7 by 6.5 feet (2 x 2.2 meters), was painted by the Dutch-American artist in 1977


Afp November 16, 2016
A man walks past ''Untitled'' by Willem De Kooning during a preview PHOTO: REUTERS

Willem de Kooning's "Untitled XXV" was sold late Tuesday at Christie's in New York for $66.3 million, a record for a work by the abstract artist and for post-war contemporary art.

The imposing work, which measures 7 by 6.5 feet (2 x 2.2 meters), was painted by the Dutch-American artist in 1977 and is emblematic of the energetic, multicolor brush strokes he used in his work of the mid 1970s.

'Walls of Peace': Painting of 457-foot-long wall complete

Christie's auction house initially valued "Untitled XXV" at $40 million (37 million euros). When the same painting was auctioned ten years ago it went for $27.1, a record at the time. The bid was placed in a phone call, and the buyer's identity was not revealed.



New York's fall auction season kicked off this week with an array of masterpieces, drawing bidders from around the world at Christie's and Sotheby's auction houses. Late Monday Edvard Munch's "Girls on the Bridge" sold for $54.5 million, the second-highest auction price paid for a work by the Norwegian painter, Sotheby's said.

The 1902 painting depicting women in colorful dresses fetched a price higher than the auction house's estimate of above $50 million. Artists discuss concept of new geometry in art

There's no shortage of bidders in the United States, Paris, London -- and increasingly Asia, with growing Chinese fortunes spent on internationally recognized works at both major auction houses.

The sales will serve as a barometer of the global art market, which did well during this year's spring auctions despite a slow 2015.

COMMENTS (1)

jia | 8 years ago | Reply where is the world going ... stupid paintings and theory of such art aghh...
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ