With 178 wickets from 35 Tests under his belt, Ajmal once ruled Pakistan’s wicket-taking charts before a bowling ban in September 2014, due to an illegal action, jolted his career.
Although he did return with a modified action for the tour of Bangladesh in April the following year, where he only managed one wicket from three matches — two ODIs, one T20I — giving away a combined 148 runs, he was not able to stamp his authority in the national side again.
That tour saw him go out of favour in the selectors’ eyes and he hasn’t made it to the national side since then.
Ajmal, Afridi left right out of central contracts
However, Ajmal believes the Bangladesh tour came too soon for him and that he is much comfortable and more lethal with the ball at the moment. “I was not comfortable with my new action [against Bangladesh] but now I am bowling with much command,” he said. “I can even bowl the doosra with this modified action.”
The 39-year-old also added that he has regained his lost touch. “I don’t think there will be any problems with my bowling action if I stage an international comeback. I have regained the lost touch and I think I can still prove myself as a champion off-spinner.”
While Pakistan have been doing remarkably well in the longest format of the game, Misbahul Haq’s side is in desperate need of a right-handed off-spinner and Ajmal has raised his hand for the role.
Shahid Afridi no longer on PCB’s payroll
“I can still bowl long spells with authority. And it’s not only in Tests, I can be very useful in the limited-over formats as well,” he said referring to his performance in the recently-held National T20 Cup, where he finished as the top wicket-taker with 20 scalps.
“All I need is just one last chance to prove myself. I think I deserve a comeback,” he said.
Published in The Express Tribune, November 2nd, 2016.
Like Sports on Facebook, follow @ETribuneSports on Twitter to stay informed and join in the conversation.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ