Ponting wants to keep Cup for top teams

Australian skipper Ricky Ponting says World Cup would be a better event if the smaller nations were excluded.


Afp February 20, 2011
Ponting wants to keep Cup for top teams

AHMEDABAD: Australian skipper Ricky Ponting said Sunday that the World Cup would be a better event if the smaller nations were excluded but acknowledged the need to grow the game around the world.

The next World Cup in 2015 will feature just 10 teams, down from the current 14, meaning it will almost certainly be the preserve of the Test sides and the minnows of the world game will be muscled out.

The International Cricket Council (ICC) has not yet revealed the qualification process but the plans have infuriated the associate nations, represented at the ongoing World Cup by Canada, Ireland, Kenya and the Netherlands.

"We understand the responsibility to keep the game growing. For that, you need to bring on some of these small nations into the world of cricket. We want to see the game develop and blossom around the world," Ponting said.

"I have always been unsure if the World Cups and the Champions Trophy are the right place to do that. And I am not sure as to how much the teams actually learn when they get hammered in these contests.

"At the end of the day, it would probably be a better tournament if there were fewer teams. The World Cup is the pinnacle of our sport," Ponting added.

The Australian skipper's comments came on the day that New Zealand crushed Kenya in an embarrassingly one-sided mismatch, with Canada also hopelessly out of their depth against joint hosts Sri Lanka.

Kenya were beaten by 10 wickets after being dismissed for just 69 -- their lowest ever World Cup total and the fifth worst in tournament history.

In the day-night match between Sri Lanka and Canada, the home side plundered 332-7 off the Canadian attack.

Devastated Kenya skipper Jimmy Kamande was left struggling for answers after his team's mauling in Chennai.

"The disappointing thing is we get to play a Test team once around every two years or so. The more we play against these guys, the better you become."

At the same time as reducing the World Cup, the ICC is increasing the number of teams that play in the World Twenty20 to 16 from the current 12.

"We have felt in the past few years that Twenty20 is the best format to develop the game worldwide and it provides a better environment for competition," ICC chief executive Haroon Lorgat said on Friday.

"The 50-over format is more skill-based and suitable for the top teams."

Cricket Kenya chief executive Tom Sears said on Thursday the ICC will not be acting in the interests of the game if the smaller teams were locked out of the next World Cup.

"If we have to improve on the standards, there is no point of denying us the opportunity of competing at the top level," Sears told AFP.

In an interview with the Wisden Cricketer magazine, Sears termed the decision as "scandalous and bloody ridiculous".

"I've no desire to be diplomatic.... Not to let anyone else in is scandalous. It's all about money, power and votes - and that's not good for cricket," he said.

Canadian coach Pubudu Dassanayake also branded the ICC plan a setback for minor nations.

Kenya became the first non-Test playing team to reach the World Cup semi-finals in 2003, and Ireland produced their biggest upset over Pakistan in the 2007 tournament in the West Indies.

COMMENTS (2)

Rizwan | 13 years ago | Reply There should be lesser teams at the World Cup who qualify after going through qualifying matches just like football. There's no harm keeping the Test and ODI nations limited. ICC and cricket lovers should understand that in today's fast moving world there's no way you can develop and expand a game throughout the world which last for a good eight hours. In my opinion only T20Is should be developed in other parts of world.
Patrick Adams | 13 years ago | Reply So Ponting says that its important for the game to develop around the world, but then says that the smaller teams should be excluded for the World Cup! How does he suggest the smaller teams can develop if they never get to play the elite sides, beyond the occasional 20 over game? Sri Lanka were awarded full ICC membership after they beat India at the 1979 World Cup and Zimbabwe were similarly rewarded after defeating England at the 1992 tournament. It seems to me that the ICC are saying we have our 10 full members and they will remain the same forever! I can't imagine FIFA ever excluding all the smaller teams from the soccer World Cup and look how that game is really starting to flourish in nations such as the USA who hitherto had never taken to the game. Cricket is in decline and the decision to exclude all the second tier teams from the 2015 World Cup will only hasten that decline. It's adapt or die and the ICC seem to be choosing the latter!
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ