UN atomic agency chief says Iran sticking to nuclear deal
The two officials, who negotiated the deal face-to-face and together with counterparts from the P5+1 powers (the United States, China, Russia, France, Britain and Germany) between 2013 and 2015, won the Chatham House Prize "in recognition of their crucial roles" to resolve "one of the most intractable diplomatic stand-offs in international affairs in the 21st century," Britain's Chatham House think-tank said in a statement.
The agreement -- aimed at stopping Iran from using its civilian nuclear industry to develop a nuclear weapon in exchange for the lifting of sanctions against Tehran -- was signed in July 2015 and implemented in January.
The deal that "many thought impossible" sealed "a victory for diplomacy as well as against nuclear proliferation," the prestigious London research center said.
US says payment to Iran used as leverage for prisoners' release
In Washington, the State Department -- which does not maintain full diplomatic relations with Tehran's Foreign Ministry -- said Kerry was "grateful for being selected for this prize," stressing that the deal was "a team effort internationally, with the other members of the P5+1, as well as the European Union."
After the deal's signing, rumors circulated about a possible Nobel Peace Prize for the P5+1 group or Kerry and Zarif last year.
The major diplomatic breakthrough helped initiate a tentative thaw in relations between the United States and Iran. However, ties have been further strained recently over Shiite Tehran's part in Syria's conflict and elsewhere in the Middle East, as well as Western banks' reluctance to invest in the Islamic republic.
Obama administration denies Iran cash payment was a ransom
Recent Chatham House Prize recipients include former US secretary of state and current presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, Burmese leader Aung San Suu Kyi and the aid organization Doctors Without Borders.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ