Heading a five-judge larger bench, the top judge said the nation was being duped in the name of democracy, while bad governance was being presented as good governance. He advised people to carefully assess the situation and prudently use their right to vote while electing their representatives.
Musharraf says democracy in Pakistan is ineffective
The Punjab government has challenged the August 19 judgment of the Lahore High Court, which had stopped the provincial authorities from carrying out development work within 200 feet of 10 heritage sites in Lahore.
The apex court bench took up Nespak, Lahore Development Authority (LDA) and Punjab government’s appeals against the high court’s verdict. Makhdoom Ali Khan, who appeared on behalf of the Punjab government, contended that the court had to satisfy that there was no legal violation but it was a matter relating to national heritage.
When he assented to the bench’s option for reconfirming technical reports on the project, a member of the bench, Justice Azmat Saeed Sheikh, said: “I am glad that Punjab government is not adamant (on this matter).”
Expressing commitment to safeguard heritage sites in Lahore, Justice Azmat asked Makhdoom Ali to assure the court that in future, this project would pose no harm to heritage sites in Lahore.
Upon this, Makhdoom Ali Khan maintained that there would be no ‘real damage’ to heritage sites.
Military takeovers left society in shambles, says CJP
Responding bluntly, Justice Azmat Saeed said: “So you think there may be (other kind of) damage – It is our heritage – it is my heritage – we (the bench) need to be satisfied that Pakistan’s culture is not put at risk - we’ll not allow anyone to vandalise Lahore – no structural damage will be tolerated.”
He also said there must be some way to gauge visual impairment and court shall decide on the issue after examining the measures.
Justice Azmat also said that the court was not expressing concern in the matter for any individual but to protect heritage sites in Lahore.
Later, the bench asked both the parties to submit three names each of independent and impartial technical experts on heritage without consulting each other today (Friday).
Published in The Express Tribune, October 14th, 2016.
COMMENTS (13)
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ