Declining CSS results leave top recruiter scratching its head

FPSC to confer with HEC, experts on factors behind poor showing


Riazul Haq October 12, 2016
PHOTO: FILE

ISLAMABAD: The disappointing results of this year’s competitive exam for civil services cast a pall over the education sector and left both students and the top recruiter shell-shocked. So much so that the Federal Public Service Commission, which conducts the exam for Central Superior Services, or CSS, decided to diagnose the problem. In an attempt to identify any flaws and failures in the system, the FPSC will begin consulting the Higher Education Commission (HEC) and academies.

In 2016, as many as 9,643 candidates sat the written test of CSS. Alarmingly however, only 202, or 2.09%, qualified, the rest failed the test. This is the lowest percentage of successful students since 2011.

“We have agreed to consult the HEC, education experts and people from academia to find out reasons for the increasingly disappointing results,” a senior official of the FPSC told The Express Tribune. The percentage of candidates qualifying the written test has come down from 9.75% in 2011 to 2.09% in 2016.

In 2015, a total of 12,176 sat the CSS written test, but only 439 passed, while only 377 qualified the interview. Similarly, 24,640 candidates applied for the written test in 2014 against 315 vacancies. Of them, only 233 managed to clear all tests.

“We will try to find out whether the problem is with the exam method, paper pattern or there are reasons other than that at play,” said the official who didn’t wish to be identified in the report. “We’ll make a thorough assessment to get to the bottom of the problem. The candidates might have been disturbed by group combinations for selection of subjects that were changed by FPSC, according to the official.

Interestingly, the number of posts against which the candidates applied has gone up from 185 in 2005 to 333 in 2015. Apart from that, the total vacant seats, including those reserved for minorities and women, are also increasing. In 2015, there were 95 vacant posts, while in 2014, 2013 and 2011, there were 82, 71 and 45 vacancies, respectively.

Moreover, the number of vacant posts reserved for minority candidates has also gone up as only five slots have been filled during the last three years. In 2013, there were 25 such vacancies, while in 2014 the numbers went up to 36 and to 44 in 2015.  Also, 82 posts reserved for women have been lying vacant since 2013.

In its annual reports, the FPSC keeps identifying the challenges it faces in the competitive exams and the way out. Two years ago, the top recruiter suggested that a compulsory screening test for appearing in the written test – but the suggestion has been pending with the Establishment Division since then.  The FPSC believes that the screening test will allow it to scrutinise the candidates at the initial step and pick out the serious ones only.

In its 2014 report, the FPSC depicted a depressing picture of competence of candidates which is now consistently being mentioned in every annual report. “The standard of performance reflected that the majority did not know the strategies of making precise and reproduced the original language of the passage,” it says in connection with the candidates’ proficiency in English.

Reports of the last three years have repeatedly been stating that the overall competence of candidates in General Knowledge is low and majority of candidates lack basic writing skills while their writing suggests crammed knowledge.

Moreover, the report adds that “very few [candidates] had a conceptual approach [about Pakistan Affairs]”.

The reports consistently carry subject-wise performance of candidates and point out flaws in the system which needs to be improved.

Published in The Express Tribune, October 12th, 2016.

COMMENTS (34)

Zeeshan Ahmad | 1 year ago | Reply Somewhat corrected Comment I am Zeeshan Ahmad. I graduated from Lahore University of Management Sciences in June 2017 with Major in Economics and Minor in Political Science. I took CSS exam held in May 2022 under roll number 053569. It was my third and final attempt. The Commission declared me fail in its result announced on December 06 2023. When I looked at my scorecard it was absolutely shocking. I had been awarded only three marks in English Essay and only seven marks in Pakistan Affairs. It was unbelievable in the sense that I had written an essay worth 97 marks. I brainstormed the topic for 15 minutes . After that I wrote a rough outline a rough introduction and a rough conclusion. Then I wrote the first draft of the whole essay. Then I wrote a second draft of the whole essay. Then I wrote a third draft of the whole essay. Finally I wrote a neat and clean essay. I read my essay four times in silence and for the fifth time a bit louder. There was not a single mistake in English grammar either. I still remember my outline my introduction and my conclusion. The topic was Imagination is more important than knowledge. My concluding sentence was Kill the imaginative power of any great civilization at its peak and in a moment it will reduced to ashes And just three marks In Pakistan Affairs paper I had corrected at least thirteen Multiple Choice Questions in Pakistan Affairs paper. How could I get only seven marks It was simply illogical. And impossible How would I attempt four subjective questions in each paper Including Pakistan Affairs I followed the following format Contents of this paper In this paper I have chosen to answer the following four questions. Their detailed outlines are inked here under Q1. Outline with headings and subheadings Q2. Outline with headings and subheadings Q5. Outline with headings and subheadings Q7. Outline with headings and subheadings Detailed Answers The details of the aforementioned outlines are written in the following pages Q1..... Q2.... Q5.... Q7.... Such was my format. Making detailed outlines would take 45-50 minutes. In the remaining time I would write detailed answers. I wrote 37-40 pages on average. Moreover I had printed and had studied published examiner reports for each subject. I would read them carefully before I left for examination center each morning. They would remind me what the examiner eventually said about us--the candidates. Continue if you wish to know more. I had prepared so well for the exam and had executed that plan to the point of perfection as well. It was third and final attempt after all. Being aggrieved I submitted a detailed review petition to the Commission on December 12 2023. In the petition I had requested the Commission to 1. Compare my papers with papers of those top 40 candidates who had qualified the written part of CSS 2022 exam. 2. Compare my papers with papers of those top 02 candidates who had qualified the written part of CSS 2022 exam from the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. 3. Compare my papers with papers of the one who topped GB-FATA region in the written part of CSS 2022 exam. I demanded such a comparison because CSS is a competitive examination and I am a Pakistani I live in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and I am from FATA. If my papers don t fall short of the aforementioned toppers why shall I be declared fail I waited for a month but the Commission didn t respond. By law it was supposed to respond to me within fifteen days. After a month I visited FPSC Headquarters in person and there I found out that my review petition had not been read yet. In addition I had to listen to the extremely arrogant unprofessional and derogatory remarks from the employees of the Commission. When I became sure that FPSC won t respond to me no what how many times I write to them or make phone calls to them or visit its headquarters I decided to approach High Court. Bear in mind that my father is a government school teacher and earns just enough to feed my family. I couldn t hire a professional lawyer for myself. Thus I learnt the whole process of drafting and submitting a reasonable writ petition by myself. I did so in less than a week. In February 2023 I filed a writ petition against FPSC in High Court Peshawar. The Court ordered the Commission to respond to my review petition expeditiously in its order dated March 07 2023. The Commission turned a blind to the Court s order as well. In April I decided to file a Contempt of Court application. Again the Court ordered the Commission to respond my review petition. But FPSC is still silent. I can show you books that I studied articles that I read research papers that I went through and through and notes that I had prepared for each subject. The strongest evidence is papers themselves. They must be somewhere in FPSC Headquarters and all citizens of Pakistan can read them. Especially professors intellectuals educationists strategists and experts. If nothing they will learn something. Allah be with me and with Pakistan Ameen.
Zeeshan Ahmad | 1 year ago | Reply I am Zeeshan Ahmad. I graduated from Lahore University of Management Sciences in June 2017 with Major in Economics and Minor in Political Science. I took CSS exam held in May 2022 under roll number 053569. It was third and final attempt. The Commission declared me fail in its announced on December 06 2023. When I looked at my scorecard it was absolutely shocking. I had been awarded only three marks in English Essay and seven marks in Pakistan Affairs. It was unbelievable in the sense that I had an essay worth 97 marks. I brainstormed about the topic for 15 minutes After that I wrote a rough outline a draft introduction and a draft conclusion. Then I wrote the first draft of the whole essay. Then I wrote a second draft of the whole essay. Then I wrote a third draft of the whole essay. At last I wrote the final draft in neat. I read my essay four times in silence and for the fifth time a bit louder. There was not a single mistake in English grammar. I still remember my outline my introduction and my conclusion. The topic was Imagination is more important than knowledge. My concluding sentence was Kill the imaginative power of any great civilization at its peak and in a moment it will reduced to ashes And just three marks In Pakistan Affairs paper I had corrected at least thirteen Multiple Choice Questions in Pakistan Affairs paper. How could I get only seven marks It was simply illogical. And impossible How would I attempt four subjective questions in each paper Including Pakistan Affairs I followed the following format Contents of this paper In this paper I have chosen to answer the following four questions. Their detailed outlines are inked here under Q1. Outline with headings and subheadings Q2. Outline with headings and subheadings Q5. Outline with headings and subheadings Q7. Outline with headings and subheadings Detailed Answers The details of the aforementioned outlines are written in the following pages Q1..... Q2.... Q5.... Q7.... Such was my format. Making detailed outlines would take 45-50 minutes. In the rest of the time I would write detailed asnwers. I wrote 37-40 pages on average. Moroever I had printed and had studied published examiner reports for each subject. I would read them carefully before I left for examination center each morning. They would remind me what the examiner eventually said about us--the candidates. Continue if you wish to know more. I had prepared so well for the exam and had executed that plan to the point of perfection as well. It was third and final attempt after all. Being aggrieved I submitted a detailed review petition to the Commission on December 12 2023. In the petition I had requested the Commission to 1. Compare my papers with papers of those top 40 candidates who had qualified the written part of CSS 2022 exam. 2. Compare my papers with papers of those top 02 candidates who had qualified the written part of CSS 2022 exam from the province of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. 3. Compare my papers with papers of the one who topped GB-FATA region in the written part of CSS 2022 exam. I demanded such a comparison because CSS is a completive examination and I am a Pakistan I live in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and I am from FATA. If my papers don t fall short of the aforementioned toppers why shall I be declared fail I waited for a month but the Commission didn t respond. By law it was supposed to respond to me within fifteen days. After month I visited FPSC Headquarters in person and there I found out that my review petition had not been read yet. In addition I had to listen to the extremely arrogant unprofessional and derogatory remarks from the employees of the Commission. When I was sure that FPSC won t respond no what how many times I write to them or make phone calls to them or visit its headquarters I decided to approach High Court. Bear in mind that my father is a government school teacher and earns just enough to feed my family. I couldn t hire a professional lawyer for myself. Thus I learnt the whole process and procedure of submitting a reasonable writ petition by myself. I did so in less than a week. In February 2023 I filed a writ petition against FPSC in High Court Peshawar. The Court ordered the Commission to respond to my review petition expeditiously in its order dated March 07 2023. The Commission turned a blind to the Court s order as well. In April I decided to file a Contempt of Court application. Again the Court ordered the Commission to respond my review petition. But FPSC is still silent. I can show you books that I studied articles that I read research papers that I went through and through and notes that I had prepared for each subject. The strongest evidence is my papers themselves. They must be somewhere in FPSC Headquarters and all citizens of Pakistan can read them. Especially professors intellectuals educationists strategists and experts. If nothing they will learn something. Allah be with me and with Pakistan Ameen.
VIEW MORE COMMENTS
Replying to X

Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.

For more information, please see our Comments FAQ