
This has the potential to be a lose-lose for all concerned. Pakistan cannot afford to lose trading routes any more than Afghanistan. Pakistan may be a poor country but Afghanistan is impoverished and wracked by war. Much of the tension derives from new border arrangements made by Pakistan, which is now demanding that all Afghans coming in via the Torkham crossing must have a passport with a valid visa — a reversal of historic custom and practice that allows free and undocumented transit for Afghan citizens. Neither side has anything to gain by impeding the trade of the other, and the somewhat threatening tone of a statement by Afghan President Ghani has done nothing to ease tensions, indeed the reverse. Both sides need to step back and take the diplomatic equivalent of a deep breath before matters deteriorate any further. Suspicions that the transit trade may be a cover for terrorist arms and activity are not unfounded; they are real and on occasion proven. If the trust deficit could be seen as an opportunity rather than a threat, then there is a chance for the intelligence and security services of both sides to address what each acknowledge as an ongoing difficulty. A problem shared is a problem halved, and allowing safe transit is a moneymaker for all concerned.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 12th, 2016.
Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ