It is more than a clash of civilisations

Published: September 11, 2016
Email
The writer is a former caretaker finance minister and served as 
vice-president at the World Bank

The writer is a former caretaker finance minister and served as vice-president at the World Bank

This is a period of enormous uncertainty in world affairs. The process of globalisation, once heralded as a phenomenon that would improve the lives of people across the globe, instead delivered something quite different. While it enormously enriched many who controlled capital, large segments of populations across the Western world were left behind and in great despair. When offered political opportunities to express their resentment, they took them in unexpected ways. In Britain, they voted for Brexit. In several countries in the European mainland, many voted in favour of parties operating on the extreme right of the political spectrum. And, in the United States, many among the voting public chose Donald Trump, a real-estate tycoon from New York, to lead the Republican Party.

Analysts have begun to see these rebellions as expressions of angst by groups of people described as “angry, not well educated white middle-aged men who occupy the lower rung of the economic order” in their countries. This group has directed their anger at foreigners who have come to their countries and taken their jobs. They are also upset with countries such as China to which jobs have migrated. They want foreigners — people as well as countries — to be excluded from their political and economic systems. It is in this environment that extremism has entered the picture. Now, a group of extremists has thrown roots in parts of the Levant — the countries bordering the Eastern Mediterranean Sea from Turkey to Egypt. It is the Islamic State.

According to the group, the ideology it is pursuing would take its followers back to the early days of Islam. The style of governance was to be shaped according to what the group believes are the teachings of Islam. The group’s ambition is to bring under its sway all those around the world who follow the Islamic faith. Their number is estimated at 1.6 billion. There is not a single country among the almost 200 members of the United Nations that does not have a Muslim presence.

The geographic state from which the Islamic State would spread out to the rest of the world is in Iraq and Syria. This area had become susceptible for a move in this direction as a result of an almost unrelenting unfolding of history. The first two decades of the 20th century saw the collapse of the Ottoman Empire that had governed most of the Muslim world for several centuries. The dissolution of the Empire led to a period that lasted for three quarters of a century when the European powers colonised a good part of the globe. They arbitrarily drew dividing lines on the world map and carved out artificial states not founded on the concept of defined nations. Those boundaries are now under attack and may not survive into the future.

The definitional struggle of the IS has resulted in the staging of three different wars: against the West, against the Muslim-majority states that would like to be governed by liberal democratic structures, and against those in the Muslim world who don’t subscribe to what they, the extremists, regard as deviants from what they believe is the true Islamic faith.

After the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991 and eastern Europe was freed from the grip of communism, several Western thinkers responded to these unexpected developments with unrestrained euphoria. Among them, notably, was Francis Fukuyama, once a student of Harvard, Professor Samuel Huntington, who had already published his book Clash of Civilisations. In the book, the Harvard professor saw incompatibility between the West and other cultural systems. His focus was not entirely on the coming conflict between Islam and the West. He divided the world into eight systems; there was potential of conflict between and among them. Fukuyama, on the other hand, did not see a coming conflict. His book The End of History argued that liberal democracy, basic human rights and the capitalist free economy were some of the components of the only remaining alternative ideology for people and nations across the world to follow. That was not to be the case. Once again, the world is moving towards a deep, conflict-ridden crisis.

Published in The Express Tribune, September 12th, 2016.

Like Opinion & Editorial on Facebook, follow @ETOpEd on Twitter to receive all updates on all our daily pieces.

 

Facebook Conversations

Reader Comments (5)

  • vinsin
    Sep 12, 2016 - 12:05AM

    It was the British Empire not Ottoman who ruled most of the Muslims. Baring few countries most of the Muslim majority countries want Sharia not secularism, liberalism and feminism.Recommend

  • Ali S
    Sep 12, 2016 - 2:08AM

    @vinsin:

    And yet hordes of them are lining up to migrate (illegally or otherwise) to decidedly secular, liberal and feminist Western nations because they respect basic human rights, and some of these Muslims shamelessly leech off these countries’ taxpayer-funded welfare system.Recommend

  • John B
    Sep 12, 2016 - 2:36AM

    The First IS founded on the ideology is Pakistan. Until the formation of Pakistan, the nations were defined by their rulers and not based on any religon. The very concept of IS was codified in the movement to create Pakistan and IS doctrine is not more different than the PAK constitution.

    All other issues of economic disparity and evils associated with the free market are as old as human civilization itself. Before we call it Capitalism Vs Communism / socialism and now we call it Free market Vs Protective economic models. Linking the economic issues with Clash of civilization is comparing apples and oranges. Recommend

  • ra
    Sep 12, 2016 - 1:40PM

    you mean artificial country pakistan,you guys should bowed to the Britisher for creating artificial country pakistan.how many muslim countries accommodate other faiths and people.the fact is Muslims don’t want to live peacefully with other faith.Recommend

  • Parvez
    Sep 12, 2016 - 1:58PM

    Nice view point…..globalization was / is a grandiose experiment initiated by the rich to further enrich the rich. The cost / consequences of the disparity caused was never taken into account and that is what we are witnessing. Not just the turmoil in the ‘ east ‘ but the ‘ blow back ‘ in the west, as well.Recommend

More in Opinion