Petitioner Salamat Ali submitted that he had bought a mobile phone for Rs13,000 from Naeem Ahmed of Ahmed Mobiles. He said that Ahmed had assured him that he would be responsible for any fault in the set. He said that he found some faults in the set and took it to Ahmed, but he refused to replace it. He prayed to the court to direct the respondent to pay him the damages.
Published in The Express Tribune, September 4th, 2016.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ