Although the IG’s intentions may be ever-so-noble, the consequences of the example he set cannot be ignored. It only serves to promote vigilantism among the masses. While the right to self-defence has been guaranteed in the Pakistan Penal Code, every person who possesses a weapon must not be encouraged to use it at their own will.
Our criminal justice system is mired with problems and inefficiencies, such as lack of training and low prosecution rates as pointed out in a PILDAT report published in 2015. Loopholes would make it difficult to ascertain the true causes of killings, which could be carried out for personal vendetta and revenge.
Moreover, promoting the culture of vigilantism would do more harm than good to the peace established in the city. The HRCP has noted in its most recent report on crime statistics that incidents of target killings have decreased. To maintain this downward trend, it is necessary that law enforcement agencies enhance their capacities and adapt rather than ask citizens to help shoot down criminals.
Those responsible for law enforcement must realise that vigilante justice not only erodes the rule of law, it is also against the basic confines of law which guarantee a fair trial. Such subversion of the due process must be discouraged rather than promoted, for we have seen many incidents of mob justice and vigilantism in the past, all across Pakistan.
The police would do itself a favour if it decides to stop doling out cash rewards to acts of vigilante justice. While it cannot be denied that the law and order situation in Karachi is in need of serious improvement, it would be foolish to seek shortcuts to achieving this aim. Instead the police must rise to the challenge. Though citizens are required to play an active part and aid the police; the police must not shift their responsibilities to the citizens by granting the general populace a licence to kill.
Published in The Express Tribune, August 22nd, 2016.
COMMENTS
Comments are moderated and generally will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive.
For more information, please see our Comments FAQ